|
Rule(s): |
802.5 |
|
Staff: |
Michael Verne |
|
Response / Comments: |
07/28/2011 – Agree. |
|
|
From:
(Redacted)
Sent: Thursday,
July 28, 2011 11:23 AM
To: Verne,
B. Michael
Cc: (Redacted)
Subject: Exemption under Rule 802.5
for Acquisitions of Investment Rental Property
Dear
Mike:
This
email is to confirm the conclusion of myself and (redacted) that a
transaction to which our clients may be parties would not be reportable. The
transaction is a stock deal, and you should assume that it exceeds the
size-of-transaction and size-of-parties thresholds.
SUMMARY
OF TRANSACTION
As
a result of the transaction, the Buyer would acquire a business whose assets
consist primarily of currently-existing ground easements, ground leases, and,
in some cases, fee simple title to real estate (such as land, rooftops, and
other structures) that either supports telecommunications towers or directly
hosts telecommunications antennae. The Seller currently leases this real
property to third parties -either (i) telecommunications tower owners (which in
turn lease space on the towers to wireless service providers such as AT&T,
T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless, and others, for their antennae) or (ii) wireless
service providers where no tower is involved (e.g., rooftops or other
structures).
The
Buyer owns and operates telecommunication towers. The Seller leases most of its
tower sites to tower operators other than the Buyer. The Seller does, however,
lease a small number of its tower sites to Buyer. Buyer, in turn, essentially
re-Ieases the Seller's real property (space on the tower) to third-party
wireless service providers. After the transaction, the Buyer will acquire
rights to the underlying real property and likely will cancel the intermediate
lease between itself and what would become its controlled entity, leaving in
place the leases with the third-party wireless service providers.
GENERAL
APPLICATION OF RULE 802.5
Rule
802.5 exempts from HSR reporting the acquisition of real property assets that
will not be rented to entities included within the acquiring person except for
the sole purpose of maintaining, managing or supervising the operation of the
real property, and will be held solely for rental or investment purposes. We
understand that cell phone towers and the land beneath them are considered to
be real property by the PNO for purposes of the Rule 802.5 exemption. See,
e.g., Informal Staff Opinion 0904001 (dated Apr. 2, 2009) (towers); Informal
Staff Opinion 0608007 (dated Aug. 10,2006) (towers and underlying real estate);
Informal Staff Opinion 9903010 (dated Mar. 19, 1999) (same, including ground
equipment supporting tower operation). We also understand from prior
conversations with PNO staff that the acquisition of ground easements and
leases (as opposed to fee simple title) would be exempt under Rule 802.5 where
a transfer of the real estate underlying those easements and leases would have
been exempt under Rule 802.5.
SPECIFIC
APPLICATION OF RULE 802.5 TO THIS TRANSACTION (THROUGH RULE 802.4)
The
real property being acquired by the Buyer in this transaction (ground
easements, ground leases, and fee simple title) is currently rented or held for
rent to third parties. The Buyer intends to lease the real estate either to
third-party wireless service providers or to third-party tower operators who,
in turn, will lease space on the towers to the wireless service providers.
Consequently, since the real property assets to be acquired will be rented out
to third parties not included within the Buyer, we concluded that the
transaction would be exempt under Rule 802.5.
The
fact that the Buyer currently leases tower sites from the Seller should not
affect the applicability of the exemption. After the transaction, these leases
will be between controlled entities of the Buyer and may be cancelled, leaving
in place the leases with the third-party wireless service providers for space
on the towers. As such, the real property to be acquired should qualify as
investment rental property under Rule 802.5.
CERTAIN
NON-EXEMPT ASSETS
As
a result of the transaction, the Buyer would also acquire certain non-exempt
assets. The Buyer's Board of Directors (or its designee) will do a fair market
valuation of those non-exempt assets, but we expect that FMV to come in at less
than $66 million.