Federal Trade Commission Received Documents March 25, 1996 P894219 B18354900141 FAIR TRADE COMMISSION CHUNGANG-DONG #1. KWACHON-SHI KYUNGGI-D0. 427-780. REPUBLIC Of KOREA March 21, 1996 Mr. Jacques Feuillan International Antitrust Division Federal Trade Commission 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20580 USA Dear Mr. Feuillan: The KFTC has been informed by the Korean Embassy in the US that there will be a FTC hearing on "Made in USA" advertisements between March 26-27. As the outcome of the hearing is expected to carry deep significance for Korean enterprises operating in the US, the KFTC has made a thorough review of the topics that will be discussed at the hearing; moreover, it has gathered the comments of various agencies and institutions. What I have enclosed is a consolidation of all the comments submitted to the KFTC for you to refer to during the hearing. I hope they serve as practical reference to you. With best wishes, Sincerely, Soon-Sik Ju Director International Affairs Division I Korea Fair Trade Commission Comments of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) 1. The need to change the standards of the FTC o The current requirement that "All or Virtually All of the Parts are of US Origin" should be eased to a more practical level. - Along with the increasing globalization of the economy, a globalization of the production process is also taking place. Under such conditions, using only locally produced parts, is having less meaning in terms of strengthening the competitiveness of an enterprise. Also, with the increasing globalization of production, it is becoming very difficult to pinpoint a single place of origin of a final product. Moreover, major international economic issues, such as those involving the WTO and the NAFTA, have brought about changes of perception among consumers. As was evident in the FTC Study of February 1991, few consumers today think that "All or Virtually All of the Parts are of US Origin" when they view a "Made in USA" advertisement. Most of the consumers these days are able to give a flexible evaluation of the degree of truth of a "Made in USA" claim according to the characteristics of different industries. 2. Gauging local content Rather than a universally applied standard such as a fixed formula, it would be more advisable to adopt a standard which can be flexibly applied taking into account the characteristics of different. Because of the difference in the degree of globalization in different industries, fulfillment of the standards differ according to different industries; for instance, light industry products can satisfy the present standards; on the other hand, automobiles seldom satisfy the "All or Virtually All" standard. 3. Caution not to discriminate against foreign products in applying the standards. o Even if foreign products with brand names such as "HYUNDAI," or "SAMSUNG" contain higher local content and are producing more added value in the US, they may be put at a competitive disadvantage compared with US products. Some US consumers have a tendency to believe that only the products made by made by enterprises headquartered in the US are "Made in USA." Thus, products with foreign brand names may be disadvantaged in terms of priority in consumer choice even if those products contain higher local content, produce higher added value, and contribute more to the enhancement of welfare of the US Consumers than US brand products produced abroad. Thus, the FTC should establish an objective standard by eliminating any subjective elements such as the nationality of an enterprise, so That the foreign brand products are not disadvantaged.