Federal Trade Commission Received Documents July 30, 1996 P894219 B18354900337 Congress of the United States House of Representatives June 4, 1996 Mr. Robert Pitofsky Chairman Federal Trade Commission Pennsylvania Avenue At 6th Street NW Washington, D.C. 20580. Dear Mr. Pitofsky: I am writing to express my support for the current standard applicable to unqualified "Made in USA" claims for product advertising or labeling. Over the last five decades, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has held that voluntary "Made in USA" claims can only be made if "all or virtually all" of the product is produced in the United States. This current standard prevents U.S. consumers from being misled, since it would seem that "Made in USA" would be interpreted by most consumers to mean that all or virtually all of the components and materials of a product have been produced in the United States. I believe the Commission would be hard-pressed to find many consumers who would interpret "Made in USA" to mean "made by non-domestic workers" or to mean that a significant portion of the product is made of components from another country. Neither does it seem necessary to change the current standard in order to deal with U.S. assembled products containing some percentage of foreign content from making "Made in USA" claims as long as they are qualified (e.g. "Made in USA of foreign and domestic components'). Many American firms make the "Made in USA" claim with pride because they believe that such a claim is valuable. Their employment, purchasing, and other manufacturing practices are in part based upon the continued integrity of the FTC's "all or virtually all" standard. If this standard were compromised, the effect could be to punish these companies and mislead the public. "Made in USA" should mean what it says and therefore I urge you to retain the current standard. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, JERRY KLECZKA Member of Congress GDK/wb