9423311 UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA In the Matter of JEANETTE L. DOUGLASS,
individually and as an officer and DOCKET NO. C-3727 COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Jeanette L. Douglass, individually and as an officer and director of Computer Business Services, Inc.("CBSI"), has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1. Respondent Jeanette L. Douglass is an officer and director of CBSI. Individually or in concert with others, she formulates, directs, controls, or participates in the policies, acts, or practices of the corporation, including the acts or practices alleged in this complaint. Her principal office or place of business is at 19348 Flippen Rd., Westfield, Indiana 46074. 2. Respondent, in concert with CBSI, has advertised, offered for sale, sold, and distributed to the public home-based business ventures. Prospective consumers who purchase home-based business ventures from CBSI come to be known by the company as "Center Owners." A "center" ordinarily consists of computer hardware, software, training manuals, marketing materials, and available technical assistance which, together, are represented to enable the owner to create products and services that can be resold profitably to the general public. 3. Beginning no later than April 1988, and continuing through the present, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated magazine, newspaper and postcard advertisements, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibit A, to induce consumers nationwide to call a toll-free number to order a free information kit. Respondent, in concert with CBSI, represents through these advertisements that consumers can expect to earn $4,000 per month using CBSI's "proven turnkey business." Exhibit A. 4. Respondent, in concert with CBSI, has also disseminated or has caused to be disseminated advertisements for home-based business ventures through commercial online services, including, but not limited to, Compuserve and America Online. Respondent, in concert with CBSI, represents through these advertisements that consumers can expect to earn $4,000 per month through CBSI's home-based business ventures. Exhibit B. 5. Respondent, in concert with CBSI, has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated several information packets containing brochures and an audio cassette tape recording by the co-founders of CBSI, George and Jeanette Douglass. These materials, which are sent to prospective purchasers of home-based business ventures, contain the following statements:
6. Respondent, in concert with CBSI, also has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated materials containing endorsements by and photographs of purported Center Owners who convey the impression that ordinary consumers can successfully start and operate one or a combination of CBSI's home-based business ventures. These materials include but are not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibit C. For example, these materials contain the following statements and depictions:
7. Beginning no later than January 1991, and continuing through the present, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has sold home-based business ventures to approximately 15,000 consumers. Center Owners ordinarily spent between $3,000 and $16,000 on CBSI's products and services. Profitability 8. Through the means described in Paragraphs 2 through 7, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has represented, expressly or by implication, that CBSI Center Owners ordinarily operate profitable businesses out of their own homes. 9. In truth and in fact CBSI Center Owners do not ordinarily operate profitable businesses out of their own homes. Indeed, it is rare for CBSI Center Owners to recoup even their initial investments. 10. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 8 was, and is, false or misleading. Substantial Income 11. Through the means described in Paragraphs 2 through 7, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has represented, expressly or by implication, that:
12. In truth and in fact:
13. Therefore, the representations set forth in Paragraph 11 were, and are, false or misleading. Endorsements: Actual Experiences 14. Through the means described in Paragraph 6, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has represented, expressly or by implication, that CBSI Center Owner endorsements appearing in CBSI's advertisements and promotional materials reflect the actual experiences of those Center Owners. 15. In truth and in fact, in numerous instances, CBSI Center Owner endorsements appearing in CBSI's advertisements and promotional materials do not reflect those Center Owners' actual experiences. 16. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 14 was, and is, false or misleading. Endorsements: Typicality and Ordinariness 17. Through the means described in Paragraph 6, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has represented, expressly or by implication, that CBSI Center Owner endorsements appearing in CBSI's advertisements and promotional materials reflect the typical or ordinary experiences of Center Owners who have attempted to use CBSI's products or services. 18. In truth and in fact, CBSI Center Owner endorsements appearing in CBSI's advertisements and promotional materials do not reflect the typical or ordinary experiences of Center Owners who have attempted to use CBSI's products or services. 19. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 17 was, and is, false or misleading. Substantiation for Earnings Claims 20. Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in CBSI's advertisements and promotional materials referred to in Paragraph 11, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has represented, expressly or by implication, that she, in concert with CBSI, possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 11, at the time the representations were made. 21. In truth and in fact, respondent, in concert with CBSI, did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 11, at the time the representations were made. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 20 was, and is, false or misleading. Automatic Telephone Dialing Systems 22. Through the means described in Paragraphs 2 through 7, respondent, in concert with CBSI, has represented, expressly or by implication, that consumers can successfully utilize automatic telephone dialing systems to market their businesses. 23. Respondent, in concert with CBSI, has failed to disclose in advertisements and promotional materials for the outbound telemarketing programs that federal law prohibits the use of an automatic telephone dialing system in the unattended mode to initiate a telephone call to any residential telephone line to transmit an unsolicited advertisement for commercial purposes without the prior express consent of the called party. This fact would be material to consumers in their purchase or use of CBSI's home-based business ventures. The failure to disclose this fact, in light of the representation made, was, and is, a deceptive practice. 24. The acts and practices of respondent as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this twenty-fourth day of March, 1997, has issued this complaint against respondent. By the Commission. Donald S. Clark SEAL: |