<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN'>

<html><head><title>535221-00092.htm</title>

<meta name='vs_defaultClientScript' content='JavaScript'>

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

<meta name='vs_targetSchema' content='http://schemas.microsoft.com/intellisense/ie3-2nav3-0'>

<meta name='Originator' content='CommentWorks'></head><body><Table>

<tr><td><b>Comment Number: </b></td><td>535221-00092</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Received: </b></td><td>6/30/2008 4:12:26 PM</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Organization: </b></td><td>CONSUMER AWARENESS INSTITUTE - and JON TAYLOR &amp; CO. - and advisor, Pyramid Scheme Alert</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Commenter: </b></td><td>Jon Taylor</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>State: </b></td><td>UT</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Agency: </b></td><td>Federal Trade Commission</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Rule: </b></td><td>Business Opportunity Rule</td></tr>

<tr><td><b>Attachments:</b></td><td><a href='535221-00092.pdf'>535221-00092.pdf</a>&nbsp<a href='http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html' target = _blank >Download Adobe Reader</a><br></td></tr></Table>

<hr><P><b>Comments:</b></p>David Lisonbee and Steve Tew are merely parroting the approval of the DSA in exempting direct sellers from RPBOR. For the facts and a correct and consumer-oriented rebuttal of the points they make,  see rebuttal of DSA comments by Consumer Awareness Instititute –Comment #535221-00091</body></html>