| Comment Number: | 522418-00131 |
| Received: | 5/31/2006 11:51:05 PM |
| Organization: | |
| Commenter: | Richard Carlisle |
| State: | AZ |
| Subject: | Business Opportunity Rule |
| Title: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking |
| CFR Citation: | 16 CFR Part 437 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
RE: Business Opportunity Rule, R511993 I wish to express my concern regarding the above rule as proposed. It would cause the legitimate home-based direct-marketing distributor additional unnecessary work and confusion. My income is dependent on a direct marketing company that is helping thousands of people with their health, mine included. As proposed, this rule would cause many who work from home, retirees, young mothers, those with physical disabilities, those beyond the hireable age, to have to seek and compete for jobs they are not equipped for and yet work productively from home. The requirement proposed of “10 nearest distributors” should be applied to used cars sold by a “legitimate” company. Where do you draw the line? And shouldn’t you have to wait 7 days before that business cashes your check and you drive away in a needed car ? As proposed this rule violates privacy, negates a viable business opportunity and is very obviously a control plan designed to usurp individual responsibility and freedom. Thank you for your time in considering my comments. Richard Carlisle