|Received:||6/9/2006 3:39:46 AM|
|Subject:||Business Opportunity Rule|
|Title:||Notice of Proposed Rulemaking|
|CFR Citation:||16 CFR Part 437|
Comments:There is no way I can support your proposed ruling and I understand that the requirements would constitute prior restraint. There is a classic Catch-22 in the proposed ruling (the requirement that 10 current customers with contact information be presented) that would effectively prevent anyone from ever launching a new business opportunity or network marketing company. The Federal CAN-SPAM act did nothing to stop SPAM and this ruling won't stop the criminal element, either. Why would you want to hinder new business start ups that could add to the tax base at a time when we are losing so many good payings jobs being replaced by $7.00 an hour jobs. This would only serve to burden honest businessmen. The scammers will just continue. Please reconsider. Thanks!