| Comment Number: | 522418-04758 |
| Received: | 6/28/2006 10:07:37 AM |
| Organization: | bww |
| Commenter: | purnananda kar |
| State: | TX |
| Subject: | Business Opportunity Rule |
| Title: | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking |
| CFR Citation: | 16 CFR Part 437 |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
Dear sir/madam, we have been in buisness since 1997.we are acheiving the emerald level in this buisness in june 2006. we are excited about the buisness and to be part of the best corporation. when we started we did get the full information in a short span of time from the upline.we did also check the reference as we asked for from our upline. as we build in our non productive time so to make it efficient we have to be very smart in giving info to the fullest in short span of time.current FTC proposal of 7day waiting period for follow up with prospect is not going to be feasible considering the potential outcome the reason is majority of people come to the buisness do not earn sygnificantly in the short time span which is always explained by Quixtar.so to build a profitable buisness and to have areturn in the time investment we have to go through lot of people.considering the fact if we have to follow seven days rule it will be extremely difficult to run a buisness like this.more or less the option we keep open to the prospect.if they want less or more time to make adecision we provide the follow up according to their need.making a fix rule does not serve the free enterprise system neither to the IBO or prosepect. IF THE SEVEN DAY RULE APPLYS THEN WE WILL NOT BE ANY DIFFERENT THE ANY COMMUNIST COUNTRY WHO DO NOT PRACTICE FREE ENTERPRISE. Second thing giving out the 10 different IBOs name as the reference.considering the factevery IBO is very unique and as a Ibo I have no right to disclose anybodies name&number to the prospect.also there is a potential risk of loosing my buisness and the other IBOS buisness,because of the information sharing .one might be very positive and one might not be.also there is potential for lawsuit in this matter secondary to discloser of information. I do agree that they need to be infomed about the quixtar through some link or literature,which we do currently.so tjis is just not a feasible rule even to think about.after all if people want to make decision there is plenty of place then get their information atleast in this country. third it is not my (IBO) responsibility to give the 10year history of quixtar.rather quixtar can include in their buisness comendium and person can read in 90days time frame and choose not to continue, he or she can withdraw and get their full refund. FTC NEEDS TO THINK NOT FROM THE PROSPECTS POINT OF VIEW SAME TIME TO THINK FROM THE POINT OF THE PROSPECT BECOMING AN IBO AND CARRY FORWARD THE OPPERTUNITY TO NEXT LEVEL.IF THIS RULES ARE IMPOSEED I BELEVIE WE ARE BECOMING NOT A NATION OF FREE ENTERPRISE AND TURNING TOWARD THE COMMUNISIM.YES IT IS FTC RESPONSIBILTY TO PROVIDE THE FULL INFORMATION TO CONSUMER AND TEHY CAN DO THAT SO IN TERMS PROVIDING MANDATED APPROVED DOCUMENT WHICH CAN BE HAND OUT TO PROSPECT SO THAT THEY CAN MAKE A RIGHT DECISION AT RIGHT TIME. ANYWAY NO BODY FORCED US OR MADE DECISION FOR US TO BUILD THE QUIXTAR BUISNESS.WE DID OUR OWN AND WE ENJOY IT.BECAUSE WE TRULY HELP PEOPLE TO EXERCISE THE FREE ENTERPRISE PUTTING OUR SWEAT. HOPE FTC MAKE A APPROPRIATE DECISION IN THIS MATTER TO EXERCISE THE FREE ENTERPRISE.