| Comment Number: | OL-102186 |
| Received: | 3/31/2004 11:15:48 AM |
| Organization: | |
| Commenter: | Bob Rintel |
| State: | CA |
| Agency: | Federal Trade Commission |
| Rule: | CAN-SPAM ANPR |
| Docket ID: | [3084-AA96] |
| No Attachments |
Comments:
In question B1, the 2nd criterion doesn't seem to require a prior relationship with the sender. Regulations should ensure that this exemption can't be exploited for commercial purposes. A company that can make money when people respond to such a message shouldn't be exempted from the Act. For example, a company selling extended warranties shouldn't be allowed to use the "warranty information" exemption to send solicitations without complying with the Act.