Comment Number: OL-101633
Received: 11/27/2004 7:04:05 PM
Organization:
Commenter: Michael Forbes
State: MD
Subject: Trade Regulation Rule on Telemarketing Sales
Title: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Request for Comment
CFR Citation: 16 CFR Part 310
No Attachments

Comments:

This update to the Do-Not-Call list almost negates the purpose of the list. An "established" relationship is too loose of a term and this vagueness combined with the relaxation to recorded messages makes it easy for companies to "phone spam" consumers. Also, the "campaign" of a company is also loosely defined. I strongly disagree with this amendment.