|
Lynn M. Dankowski, Esq.
Church, Harris, Johnson & Williams, P.C.
201 West Main Street, Suite 104
Missoula, Montana 59807-7007
- Re: Section 807(16) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Dear Ms. Dankowski:
I am responding
to your request for an opinion regarding whether your client, a collection agency, would
violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA") if it uses the words
"Creditor's Bureau" in its name when communicating with consumers. As you point
out, section 807(16) of the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(16), prohibits "debt
collectors," such as your client, from falsely representing or implying that they
operate or are employed by a "consumer reporting agency," as that term is
defined by section 603(f) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(f).
If a debt
collector is also a "consumer reporting agency," the FDCPA does not prohibit the
debt collector from using a company name such as "Credit Bureau of ____" to
indicate that it is a consumer reporting agency. Based on your letter, however, it does
not appear that your client's business has a consumer reporting agency component. Thus,
the issue is whether your client's use of the proposed company name, "Creditor's
Bureau of Missoula," when contacting consumers(1)
would be a false representation or implication that the company is, at least in part, a
consumer reporting agency. In the Staff Commentary on the FDCPA, Commission staff stated
that "[o]nly a bona fide consumer reporting agency may use names such as "Credit
Bureau," "Credit Bureau Collection Agency," "General Credit
Control," "Credit Bureau Rating, Inc.," or "National Debtors
Rating." 53 Fed. Reg. 50097, 50107 (Dec. 13, 1998).(2)
All five of these company names imply that the company is in the business of reporting
credit information to consumers' prospective creditors. I believe that your client would
violate section 807(16) if it used any of these five company names when contacting
consumers.
Unlike the five
prohibited company names listed above, however, the name "Creditor's Bureau of
Missoula" does not, by itself, appear to imply that the company is in the business of
reporting credit information to prospective creditors. When most consumers refer to
consumer reporting agencies, they use the term "credit bureau," rather than the
term "creditor's bureau." Thus, if your client includes nothing
else in its collection letters to give consumers the false impression that the company is
a consumer reporting agency, it appears that your client would not violate section 807(16)
by using the name Creditor's Bureau of Missoula. To strengthen your client's contention
that it is not violating section 807(16), however, I recommend that the company's
collection communications, both oral and written, make abundantly clear to consumers that
they are being contacted by a debt collector and not a credit bureau.
The views
expressed in this letter represent an informal staff opinion and are not binding on the
Commission. They do, however, reflect the staff's current enforcement position.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Kane
Endnotes:
1. The FDCPA does not address what name a debt collector may use for
purposes other than its contacts with consumers.
2. See also Letter from Roger J. Fitzpatrick, Attorney, Division
of Credit Practices, Federal Trade Commission, to Thomas Isgrigg (Nov.
10, 1992) at 3 (attached and available from the Commission's website at www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpajump.htm).
|