Ref: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1999/9904/coppa.htm

The proposed rule, which is subject to public comment, applies to commercial websites directed to, or that knowingly collect information from, children under 13.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have no problem with restricting sites that are *directed* to children under 13. I have problems with *knowingly* collect.

Let's take the CNN site as an example. They offer feedback and opinion forums. I would argue that they *know* that some of their readers are under 13. And that at least a few of these readers participate.Thus, CNN knowingly collects information from children under 13.  

As written, the rule would attempt to interfere with the rights of children under 13 from expressing political opinion. You could argue that the average child under 13 wouldn't want to do this.

I'd agree that the average child wouldn't want to. But some would. Back when I was 11, I did write a letter to the editor of the local paper.

And if only one child wants to express his freedom of speech, the federal government should not interfere. Period. 

OK, that was the extreme case. But any website that offers feedback shouldknow that it is possible that a child under 13 might decide to send an unsolicited e-mail. If they know, then they violate the rule.  

My suggestion is to rewrite the rule. At least remove the "knowingly" clause.

If you want a better suggestion, I will need more information on the problem you are trying to solve.