The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
1012001 Informal Interpretation
FTC Staff Comment Before the Georgia Board of Dentistry Concerning Proposed Amendments to Board Rule 150.5-0.3 Governing Supervision of Dental Hygienists
FTC Comment Before the Federal Reserve Board Concerning the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), Docket No. OP-1388
16 C.F.R. Part 322: Mortgage Assistance Relief Services; Final Rule and Statement of Basis and Purpose
Preliminary FTC Staff Privacy Report
Statement of the Commission, In the Matter of Laboratory Corporation of America and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rosch, In the Matter of Laboratory Corporation of America and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission on Antitrust Enforcement in the Health Care Industry
1011007 Informal Interpretation
Reverb Communications, Inc.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request
In Deep Services, Inc., a California corporation, also d/b/a Grants For You Now, et al.
Pilot Corporation, Propeller Corp., and Flying J Inc., In the Matter of
The FTC required Pilot Corporation, owner of the largest travel center network in the United States, to sell 26 locations as part of a settlement that will replace the competition lost because of Pilot’s proposed $1.8 billion acquisition of Flying J Inc.’s travel center network. Pilot has agreed to sell the travel centers, which provide diesel, food, parking, and other amenities for truckers, to Love’s Travel Stops and Country Stores, the smallest national travel center operator, currently concentrated in the South. According to the FTC’s complaint, the deal would have reduced competition for certain long-haul trucking fleets for which Pilot and Flying J were the first and second best choices for diesel.
20110193: Marubeni Corporation; BP p.l.c
20110183: Wellspring Capital Partners IV, L.P.; Estate of Robert H. Brooks
Rite Aid Corporation, In the Matter of
Rite Aid is prohibited from using facial recognition technology for security or surveillance purposes for five years to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the retailer failed to implement reasonable procedures and prevent harm to consumers in its use of facial recognition technology in hundreds of stores.
The order requires Rite Aid to implement comprehensive safeguards to prevent these types of harm to consumers when deploying automated systems that use biometric information to track them or flag them as security risks. It also requires Rite Aid to discontinue using any such technology if it cannot control potential risks to consumers. To settle charges it violated a 2010 Commission data security order by failing to adequately oversee its service providers, Rite Aid is also required to implement a robust information security program, which must be overseen by the company’s top executives.