The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20170154: CONSOL Energy Inc.; Noble Energy, Inc.
20170158: Quad-C Partners VIII, L.P.; Fusion Partners, LLC
20170160: Buckeye Partners, L.P.; Vitol Investment Partnership Limited
20170161: Buckeye Partners, L.P.; Vitol Holding B.V.
20170168: Quantum Energy Partners VI, LP; Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
20170176: Soohyung Kim; Twin River Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
20170177: InPhi Corporation; ClariPhy Communications, Inc.
20170183: Quad-C Partners VIII, L.P.; Wells Fargo & Company
20170190: Richard Webb; Kinder Morgan, Inc.
20170191: Galanos Investments L.P.; KPS Special Situations Fund IV, LP
HeidelbergCement AG and Italcementi S.p.A., In the Matter of
German cement producer HeidelbergCement AG and Italian producer Italcementi S.p.A. agreed to divest a cement plant in Martinsburg, WV and up to 11 cement distribution terminals in six other states to settle charges that their proposed $4.2 billion merger would likely harm competition in five regional markets for cement in the United States. Heidelberg and Italcementi are the second and fourth largest producers of cement in the world, and in the United States, the two companies compete through their respective U.S. subsidiaries, Lehigh Hanson and Essroc Cement Corp., to sell portland cement – an essential ingredient in making concrete. According to the FTC complaint, the merger as proposed would harm competition for portland cement in five metropolitan areas: Baltimore-Washington, DC; Richmond, Virginia; Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, Virginia; Syracuse, New York; and Indianapolis, Indiana. In each of these markets, the FTC alleges the merger as originally proposed would have reduced the number of competitively significant suppliers from three to two. The proposed consent agreement requires the merged company to divest to an FTC-approved buyer an Essroc cement plant and quarry in Martinsburg, West Virginia; seven Essroc terminals in Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania; and a Lehigh terminal in Solvay, New York. At the buyer’s option, the order also requires the merged company to divest two additional Essroc terminals in Ohio. Under the proposed order, these divestitures must occur within 120 days after the merger is complete. In addition, the merged company has ten days after the merger is complete to divest Essroc’s terminal in Indianapolis to Cemex, Inc.
16110004 Informal Interpretation
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment; Proposed Consent Agreement
16 CFR Part 314: Standards For Safeguarding Customer Information: Extension of the Public Comment Period Until November 21, 2016
Federal Trade Commission Enforcement Policy Statement on Marketing Claims for Over-the-Counter Homeopathic Drugs
20170119: HKW Capital Partners IV, L.P.; Xirgo Technologies, Inc.
20170133: j2 Global, Inc.; Everyday Health, Inc.
NPB Advertising, Inc., et al.
In May 2014, the Federal Trade Commission sued a Florida-based operation that it alleged capitalized on the green coffee diet fad by using bogus weight loss claims and fake news websites to market the dietary supplement Pure Green Coffee.
In November 2016, at the request of the FTC, a U.S. district court judge issued a summary decision and $30 million judgment against the pitchman behind the operation.
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, ruled that Nicholas Scott Congleton deceptively marketed Pure Green Coffee for weight loss through NPB Advertising, Inc. and a web of other companies under his control. The court order permanently bars him from the deceptive advertising practices challenged by the Commission.
In March 2025, the FTC sent more than $905,000 in refunds to consumers who bought Pure Green Coffee.