UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Civil Action No.
STIPULATION
Whereas, Plaintiff United States of America
("United States") intends to commence an action
alleging that Defendant Mahle GmbH, which operates in the
territory of the United States of America through its
subsidiary Defendant Mahle, Inc., acquired more than
50 percent of the voting securities of Defendant
Metal Leve, S.A., which operates in the territory of the
United States of America through its subsidiary Defendant
Metal Leve, Inc., in violation of the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 ("HSR Act"),
15 U.S.C. § 18a, which imposes certain notification and
waiting requirements on both the purchasing company and
the target company in such an acquisition, that Defendant
MABEG, e.V. is the ultimate parent entity of Mahle GmbH
and Mahle, Inc., and that Defendants have been
continuously in violation of the HSR Act since the
acquisition;
Whereas, the HSR Act provides that civil penalties may
be recovered in a civil action brought by the United
States against persons that fail to comply with its
provisions; and
Whereas, Defendants have entered into an Agreement
Containing Consent Order with the Federal Trade
Commission, which provides that Defendants shall divest
certain assets and businesses to resolve charges to be
brought by the Federal Trade Commission that the
acquisition may substantially lessen competition in
violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Section 7 of the
Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18;
Now, therefore, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by
and between the undersigned parties, by their respective
counsel, that:
1. The parties consent that, upon the motion of the
United States and without further notice to any party or
other proceedings, and provided that the United States
has not withdrawn its consent, which it may do at any
time before the entry of Final Judgment, a Final Judgment
may be filed and entered by the Court to order, adjudge,
and decree,
- a. that the Court has jurisdiction of the subject
matter herein and of Plaintiff and Defendants and
that the Complaint states a claim upon which
relief can be granted against Defendants under
Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 18a.
-
- b. that, pursuant to Section 7A(g)(1) of the
Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a(g)(1),
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996,
Pub. L. 104-134 § 31001(s) (amending
the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment
Act of 1990, 28 U.S.C. § 2461), and
Federal Trade Commission Rule 1.98,
16 C.F.R. § 1.98,
61 Fed. Reg. 54549 (Oct. 21,
1996), judgment be entered
- i. that Mahle GmbH, Mahle, Inc., and MABEG,
e.V. be ordered jointly and severally to pay
to the United States a civil penalty in the
amount of $10,000 a day from June 26,
1996, through November 19, 1996 plus
$11,000 a day from November 20, 1996,
through the date of the filing by Defendants
of an application to divest with the Federal
Trade Commission pursuant to the Agreement
Containing Consent Order In the Matter of
Mahle GmbH (Federal Trade Commission File No.
961-0085) and pursuant to Federal Trade
Commission Rule 2.41(f), 16 C.F.R.
§ 2.41(f), which application to divest
is subsequently approved by the Federal Trade
Commission and pursuant to which application
to divest the divestiture proposed in the
application is accomplished as approved by
the Federal Trade Commission,
-
- ii. that Metal Leve, S.A. and Metal Leve,
Inc. be ordered jointly and severally to pay
to the United States a civil penalty in the
amount of $10,000 a day from June 26,
1996, through November 19, 1996 plus
$11,000 a day from November 20, 1996,
through the date of the filing by Defendants
of an application to divest with the Federal
Trade Commission pursuant to the Agreement
Containing Consent Order In the Matter of
Mahle GmbH (Federal Trade Commission File No.
961-0085) and pursuant to Federal Trade
Commission Rule 2.41(f), 16 C.F.R.
§ 2.41(f), which application to divest
is subsequently approved by the Federal Trade
Commission and pursuant to which application
to divest the divestiture proposed in the
application is accomplished as approved by
the Federal Trade Commission,
-
- iii. that if an application to divest is
filed with the Federal Trade Commission but
the divestiture proposed in the application
is not accomplished, either because the
Federal Trade Commission does not approve the
application or for any other reason, then
civil penalties that the Defendants are
ordered to pay shall continue to accrue as
though the application had never been made
through the date of the filing of an
application to divest, which is subsequently
approved by the Federal Trade Commission and
pursuant to which the divestiture proposed in
the application is accomplished as approved
by the Federal Trade Commission, and
-
- iv. that if the divestiture required by the
Agreement Containing Consent Order is not
completed within the time frame required
therein, and if divestiture is thereafter
accomplished by a trustee pursuant to the
Agreement Containing Consent Order, then
civil penalties that Defendant are ordered to
pay shall continue to accrue through the date
on which the divestiture is completed,
- c. that the civil penalties shall be due and
payable within the later of 30 days from the date
of the divestiture or 30 days from the date of
entry of final judgment, by wire transfer of
funds to the United States Treasury through the
Treasury Financial Communications System or by
cashier's check payable to the Treasurer of the
United States and delivered to Chief, FOIA Unit,
Antitrust Division, Department of Justice,
Liberty Place, 325 7th Street, N.W., Suite 200,
Washington, D.C., 20530,
-
- d. that in the event of a default in payment,
interest at the rate of eighteen (18) percent per
annum shall accrue thereon from the date of
default to the date of payment,
-
- e. that each party shall bear its own costs of
the action, and
-
- f. that entry of final judgment is in the public
interest;
2. In the event the United States does not commence an
action alleging a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 18a or
withdraws its consent, or in event that Final Judgment is
not entered pursuant to this Stipulation, this
Stipulation shall be of no effect whatever and the making
of this Stipulation shall be without prejudice to any
party in this or any other proceeding;
3. This Stipulation and the Final Judgment
contemplated hereby are for settlement purposes only and
do not constitute an admission by Defendants in this or
any other proceeding that they have violated the HSR Act
or any other provision of law; and
4. The entry of Final Judgment in accordance with this
Stipulation settles, discharges, and releases any and all
claims of the United States for civil penalties against
Defendants pursuant to Section 7A(g)(1) of the HSR Act,
15 U.S.C. § 18a(g)(1), for failure to comply
with any provision of the HSR Act in connection with the
acquisition by Mahle GmbH, and its ultimate parent entity
MABEG, e.V., which operate in the territory of the United
States of America through their subsidiary Mahle, Inc.,
of more than 50 percent of the voting securities of
Metal Leve, S.A., which operates in the territory of the
United States of America through its subsidiary Metal
Leve, Inc.
5. Defendants waive any objection to venue or
jurisdiction for purposes of this Stipulation or the
Final Judgment contemplated hereby and authorize Michael
N. Sohn, Esq., Arnold & Porter, 555 Twelfth Street,
N.W., Washington, D..C. 20004-1202, or any replacement he
designates by notice in writing to counsel for Plaintiff,
to accept service of process in this matter on behalf of
Defendants.
6. The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of
Justice may make this Stipulation, and information with
respect thereto, public at any time.
Dated:
FOR DEFENDANTS MAHLE GMBH, MAHLE, INC., MABEG, E.V.,
AND METAL LEVE, S.A., AND METAL LEVE, INC.:
______________________________
Michael N. Sohn
Arnold & Porter
555 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004-1202
(202) 942-5000 |
|
FOR DEFENDANT METAL LEVE, INC.:
_______________________________
Jay A. Herbst, Esq.
Driggers, Schultz, Herbst & Patterson
2600 W. Big Beaver, Suite 550
Troy, MI 48084
(610) 649-6000
FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
_________________________
Joel I. Klein
Acting Assistant Attorney General _________________________
Lawrence Fullerton
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
_________________________
Constance K. Robinson
Director of Operations
_________________________
Robert A. Potter
Chief, Legal Policy Section
_________________________
Jack Sidorov
Attorney
Antitrust Division
Department of Justice
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 514-3958
|
_________________________
William J. Baer
Director _________________________
George S. Cary
Senior Deputy Director
_________________________
M. Howard Morse
Assistant Director
_________________________
Morris A. Bloom
Attorney
_________________________
Robert N. Cook
Attorney
Mergers II Division
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580
(202) 326-2707
|
_____________________
Daniel P. Ducore
Assistant Director ______________________
Elizabeth A. Piotrowski
Deputy Assistant Director
______________________
Kenneth M. Davidson
Attorney
Compliance Division
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580
(202) 326-2863
|
|