B228468 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In the Matter of METAGENICS, INC., a corporation
doing business as Ethical Nutrients and DOCKET NO. 9267 AMENDED COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Metagenics, Inc., a corporation, doing business as Ethical Nutrients, and Jeffrey Katke, individually and as an officer of said corporation ("respondents"), have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, alleges: PARAGRAPH ONE: Respondent Metagenics, Inc., doing business as Ethical Nutrients, is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, with its principal office or place of business at 971 Calle Negocio, San Clemente, California 92672. Respondent Jeffrey Katke is an officer of Metagenics, Inc. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs and controls the acts and practices of the said corporation, including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint. His business address is 971 Calle Negocio, San Clemente, California 92672. PARAGRAPH TWO: Respondents have manufactured, advertised, offered for sale, sold and distributed an orally-ingested product containing microcrystalline hydroxyapatite ("MCHC"), minerals and protein, under the name Bone Builder (hereinafter "MCHC" or "Bone Builder"). Respondents also offer for sale and sell the MCHC product to other parties who market the product under their own brand names. Bone Builder is a food and/or drug, as the terms "food" and "drug" are defined in Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. PARAGRAPH THREE: The acts and practices of respondents alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. PARAGRAPH FOUR: Respondents have disseminated or have caused to be disseminated advertisements and promotional materials for Bone Builder, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibits A through D. These advertisements and promotional materials contain the following statements:
PARAGRAPH FIVE: Through the use of the statements contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH FOUR, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits A through D, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that:
PARAGRAPH SIX: Through the use of statements contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH FOUR, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits A through D, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that at the time they made the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH FIVE, respondents possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representations. PARAGRAPH SEVEN: In truth and in fact, at the time respondents made the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH FIVE, respondents possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis to substantiate that: adequate calcium intake has many benefits and is one of the essential factors in the body's ongoing process of removal of old bone and replacement by new bone; in conjunction with other factors, adequate calcium intake can play a significant role in reducing the rate of bone loss or bone thinning and in protecting bone strength; and individuals who do not consume adequate calcium are at greater risk of experiencing bone fractures than those who do. However, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations in PARAGRAPH FIVE. Therefore, the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH SIX was, and is, false and misleading. PARAGRAPH EIGHT: Through the use of the statements contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH FOUR, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits A through D, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that scientific research, including clinical tests, scientific papers and/or scientific studies, proves that:
PARAGRAPH NINE: In truth and in fact, the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH EIGHT have not been proven by scientific research, including clinical tests, scientific papers and/or scientific studies. Therefore, the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH EIGHT were, and are, false and misleading. PARAGRAPH TEN: The acts and practices of respondents as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices and the making of false advertisements in or affecting commerce in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this twenty-third day of October, 1997, has issued this amended complaint against respondents. By the Commission, Commissioner Anthony not participating.. Donald S. Clark [Exhibits A-D attached to paper copies of complaint, but not available in electronic form.] |