UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In the Matter of COMPUTRADE LLC, a corporation, and BERNARD LEWIS, individually and as an officer of the corporation. DOCKET NO. COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that CompuTrade LLC, a corporation, and Bernard Lewis, individually and as an officer of the corporation ("respondents"), have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1. Respondent CompuTrade LLC is a Nevada corporation with its principal office or place of business at 24591 Del Prado, Dana Point, CA 92629. 2. Respondent Bernard Lewis is an officer of the corporate respondent. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, or controls the policies, acts, or practices of the corporation, including the acts or practices alleged in this complaint. His principal office or place of business is the same as that of CompuTrade LLC. 3. Respondents have advertised, offered for sale, sold, and distributed a currency trading computer program and training to the public. Respondents advise their clients to buy and sell specific foreign currencies on a daily basis. Respondents sell their program and training through their Internet Web sites, www.computrades.com and www.computrader.net. 4. The acts and practices of respondents alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 5. Respondents have disseminated or have caused to be disseminated Internet advertisements for their currency trading program and training, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibit A, pages 1 through 8. These advertisements contain the following statements:
6. Through the means described in Paragraph 5, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that:
7. Through the means described in Paragraph 5, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that they possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 6, at the time the representations were made. 8. In truth and in fact, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 6, at the time the representations were made. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 7 was, and is, false or misleading. 9. Through the means described in Paragraph 5, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication that users of respondents' currency trading program can reasonably expect to trade with little financial risk. 10. In truth and in fact, users of respondents' currency trading program cannot reasonably expect to trade with little financial risk. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 9 was, and is, false or misleading. 11. The acts and practices of respondents as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this day of , 2000, has issued this complaint against respondents. By the Commission. Donald S. Clark SEAL |