UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
MODERN CREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES,
INC., a corporation,
MATTHEW A. HAMMACK, individually and as an officer and director of the
corporation, and
ROBERT HANSEL, individually and as an officer and director of the
corporation, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 3-99CV1756-G
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND
MONETARY RELIEF
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission"),
commenced this action by filing a Complaint pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b,
charging the defendants with engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in
violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and the FTC's Telemarketing
Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310.
Now the Commission and defendants agree to a settlement of this action without trial or
adjudication of any issue of law or fact herein and without the defendants admitting
liability for any of the violations alleged in the complaint or for any wrongdoing
whatsoever. The Commission and defendants consent to entry of this Final Order without
trial or adjudication of any issue of law or fact herein.
Upon the consent of the parties hereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND
DECREED as follows:
FINDINGS
- 1. This is an action by the Commission instituted under Sections 5, 13(b), and 19 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45, 53(b), and 57b, and the
Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310. The Complaint seeks both permanent
injunctive relief and consumer redress for alleged deceptive acts or practices by the
defendants in connection with the promotion, offering for sale and sale of services
relating to credit cards, loans, or other extensions of credit. The Complaint states a
claim upon which relief may be granted against defendants under Sections 5, 13(b), and 19
of the FTC Act, and the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
-
- 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case and has jurisdiction
over the defendants. Venue in the Northern District of Texas is proper.
-
- 3. The activities of defendants are in or affecting commerce, as commerce is defined in
15 U.S.C. § 44.
-
- 4. Defendants waive all rights to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest
the validity of this Order. Defendants also waive any claim that they may hold under the
Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (as amended), concerning the
prosecution of this action to the date of this Order. Defendants shall bear their own
costs and attorneys fees.
-
- 5. Entry of this Order is in the public interest.
-
- 6. This Order is remedial in nature and shall not be construed as the payment of a fine,
penalty, punitive assessment, or forfeiture.
DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Final Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary
Relief, the following definitions shall apply:
- 1. "Telemarketing" shall mean any business
activity (which includes, but is not limited to, initiating or receiving telephone calls,
managing others who initiate or receive telephone calls, operating an enterprise that
initiates or receives telephone calls, owning an enterprise that initiates or receives
telephone calls, or otherwise participating as an officer, director, employee or
independent contractor in an enterprise that initiates or receives telephone calls) that
involves attempts to induce consumers to purchase any item, good, service, partnership
interest, trust interest or other beneficial interest, or to enter a contest for a prize,
by means of telephone sales presentations, either exclusively or in conjunction with the
use of other forms of marketing. Provided that the term "telemarketing"
shall not include transactions that are not completed until after a face-to-face contact
between the seller or solicitor and the consumers solicited. Provided
further, that for the purposes of Paragraph IC, the definition of telemarketing shall
be consistent with 16 C.F.R. § 310.2.
-
- 2. "Person" means any individual, group,
unincorporated association, limited or general partnership, corporation, or other business
entity.
-
- 3. "Assets" means all real and personal property
of any defendant, or held for the benefit of any defendant, including but not limited to
"goods," " instruments," "equipment," "fixtures,"
"general intangibles," "inventory," "checks," or
"notes," (as these terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code), lines of
credit, and all cash, wherever located.
-
- 4. "Document" is synonymous in meaning and equal
in scope to the usage of the term in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(a) and includes
writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, audio and video recordings, computer
records, and other data compilations from which the information can be obtained and
translated, if necessary, through detection devices into reasonably usable form. A draft
or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of the term.
-
- 5. "Assisting others" means knowingly providing
any of the following goods or services to another entity: (1) performing customer service
functions, including, but not limited to, receiving or responding to consumer complaints;
(2) formulating or providing, or arranging for the formulation or provision of, any
telephone sales script or any other marketing material; (3) providing names of, or
assisting in the generation of, potential customers; or (4) performing marketing services
of any kind.
ORDER
I. PROHIBITED BUSINESS ACTIVITIES
A. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, in
connection with the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, or sale of services
relating to credit cards, loans, or other extensions of credit, defendants Modern Credit
Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel, and their successors,
assigns, directors, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other
persons or entities in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice
of this Order by personal service or otherwise, whether acting directly or through any
corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, are hereby permanently restrained and
enjoined from:
- 1. Misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, that
consumers who pay a required advance fee can reasonably expect to receive a credit card,
loan, or other extension of credit;
-
- 2. Misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, that any
defendant has connections with sources that are likely to result in the provision of
credit cards, loans, or other extensions of credit; and
-
- 3. Misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, any fact
material to a consumer's decision to purchase services relating to credit cards, loans, or
other extensions of credit from any defendant;
B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with
respect to the advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or sale of any good
or service, defendants Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and
Robert Hansel, and their successors, assigns, directors, officers, agents, servants,
employees, attorneys, and all other persons or entities in active concert or participation
with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise,
whether acting directly or through any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device,
are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from misrepresenting, expressly or by
implication, any fact material to a consumer's decision to purchase defendants' products
or services; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants
Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel, and their
successors, assigns, directors, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all
other persons or entities in active concert or participation with them who receive actual
notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, whether acting directly or through
any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, are hereby permanently restrained
and enjoined from violating or assisting others in violating any provision of the
Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310, including but not limited to: (1) stating
that consumers have a high likelihood of obtaining a credit card, such as a Visa or
MasterCard, in return for the payment in advance of a one-time fee; and (2) requesting or
receiving payment of any fee or consideration in advance of obtaining or arranging an
extension of credit when they have guaranteed or represented a high likelihood of success
in obtaining or arranging an extension of credit.
II. BOND REQUIREMENT
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the defendants Modern Credit
Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel, whether acting directly
or indirectly through any persons or entities under such defendant's control, are hereby
permanently enjoined and restrained from engaging in or assisting others engaged in
telemarketing or in the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, or sale of services
relating to credit cards, loans, or other extensions of credit, unless, prior to engaging
in or assisting others engaged in such activities, such defendant first obtains a
performance bond ("the Bond") in the principal sum of five hundred thousand
dollars ($500,000). The terms and conditions of the Bond requirement are as follows:
- A. The Bond shall be conditioned upon compliance with Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15
U.S.C. § 45(a), the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 310, and with the
provisions of this Order. The Bond shall be deemed continuous and remain in full force and
effect as long as such defendant is engaging in or assisting others engaged in
telemarketing or in the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, or sale of services
relating to credit cards, loans, or other extensions of credit. Such defendant shall
maintain the Bond for a period of five (5) five years after such defendant provides notice
to the Commission that such defendant has ceased engaging in or assisting others engaged
in telemarketing or in the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, or sale of services
relating to credit cards, loans, or other extensions of credit. The Bond shall cite this
Order as the subject matter of the Bond, and shall provide surety thereunder against
financial loss resulting from whole or partial failure of performance due, in whole or in
part, to any violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, or
the provisions of this Order, or to any other violation of law;
-
- B. The Bond required pursuant to this Paragraph shall be an insurance agreement
providing surety for financial loss issued by a surety company that is admitted to do
business in each state in which such defendant, or any entity directly or indirectly under
such defendant's control, is doing business and that holds a Federal Certificate of
Authority As Acceptable Surety On Federal Bond and Reinsuring. The Bond shall be in favor
of both: (1) the Federal Trade Commission for the benefit of any consumer injured as a
result of any activities that required obtaining the Bond; and (2) any consumer so
injured;
-
- C. The Bond required pursuant to this Paragraph is in addition to, and not in lieu of,
any other bonds required by federal, state, or local law;
-
- D. At least ten (10) days before commencing in any activity that requires obtaining the
Bond, such defendant shall provide notice to the Commission describing in reasonable
detail said activities, and include in such notice a copy of the Bond obtained;
-
- E. Such defendant shall not disclose the existence of the Bond to any consumer without
simultaneously making the following disclosure: "THE BOND IS REQUIRED BY ORDER OF THE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT AS PART OF A FINAL ORDER AGAINST [name of such defendant] in FTC v.
Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., et al., Civ. Action No. 3-99CV1756-G, U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The disclosure shall be set forth
in a clear and conspicuous manner, separated from all other text, in 100 percent black ink
against a light background, in print at least as large as the main text of the sales
material or document, and enclosed in a box containing only the required disclosure.
III. MONETARY RELIEF
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Modern Credit Financial
Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel shall be jointly and severally
liable for payment of equitable monetary relief, including, but not limited to, consumer
redress and/or disgorgement, and for paying any attendant expenses of administration of
any redress fund, in the amount of FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($15,000). .
- A. Prior to or concurrently with the execution of this Order, the defendants shall turn
over the entire payment of FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($15,000) to their attorney who shall
hold it in escrow until the entry of this Order. Within ten (10) days of the date of entry
of this Order, the defendants shall transfer the escrowed amount in the form of a wire
transfer or certified or cashier's check made payable to the Commission, or such agent as
the Commission may direct.
-
- B. Time is of the essence for the payment specified above. In the event that the
defendants do not fulfill, or only partially fulfill, the payment obligation set forth in
this Paragraph, they shall be immediately liable for payment of the entire amount due plus
interest, less any payments already made. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Order, the defendants agree that, if they fail to meet the payment obligation set forth in
this Paragraph, the facts as alleged in the Complaint filed with this Order shall be taken
as true in any subsequent litigation filed by the Commission to enforce its rights
pursuant to this Order, including, but not limited to, a nondischargeability complaint in
any subsequent bankruptcy proceeding.
-
- C. Any funds received by the Commission pursuant to this Paragraph shall be deposited in
an account maintained by the Commission or its agent. Upon the final disposition of this
action, said assets shall be either: (1) distributed as redress to consumers, or (2) paid
to the U.S. Treasury, if such distribution is deemed impractical. If the Commission, in
its sole discretion, determines that redress is practical, it shall submit a plan for the
disbursement of funds to the Court for review and approval. In establishing this plan, the
Commission shall have full and sole discretion to determine the criteria and parameters
for participation by injured consumers in a redress program, and may delegate any and all
tasks connected with such redress program to any individuals, partnerships, or
corporations, and pay the fees, salaries, and expenses incurred thereby in carrying out
said tasks from the funds received pursuant to this Paragraph.
IV. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's agreement to and the
Court's approval of this Order is expressly premised upon the truthfulness, accuracy, and
completeness of the financial statements and information provided by defendants Modern
Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel to counsel for the
Commission on or about September 22, 1999, which contain material information relied upon
by the Commission in negotiating and agreeing to the terms of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Commission should have evidence that
the above-referenced financial statements and information failed to disclose any material
asset the value of which exceeds $1,000, materially misrepresented the value of any asset,
or made any other material misrepresentation or omission, the Commission may move that the
Court reopen this Order for the sole purpose of allowing the Commission to modify the
monetary liability of the defendants. If the Court finds that any defendant(s) failed to
disclose any material asset, materially misrepresented the value of any asset, or made any
other material misrepresentation or omission in the above-referenced financial statements
and information, the Court shall enter judgment against such defendant(s), in favor of the
Commission, in the amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000), which the defendants and the Commission stipulate is the amount of
consumer injury caused by the defendants, less any redress amounts previously paid.
Should this judgment be modified as to the monetary liability of the defendants, this
Order, in all other respects, shall remain in full force. Any proceedings instituted under
this Paragraph shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any other proceedings the
Commission may initiate to enforce this Order. Solely for the purposes of reopening or
enforcing this Paragraph, defendants waive any right to contest any of the allegations set
forth in the Complaint filed in this matter.
V. COLLECTING UNPAID REDRESS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants Modern Credit Financial
Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel shall cooperate fully with the
Commission and its agents in all attempts to collect the amount due pursuant to Paragraphs
III and IV, if the defendants fail to pay fully the amount due at the time specified by
this Order. In such an event, the defendants agree to provide the Commission with their
federal and state tax returns for the preceding three (3) years, and with full updated
financial disclosures, in the form as was previously submitted by defendants as referenced
in Paragraph IV, above, within ten (10) business days of receiving a request from the
Commission to do so. The defendants further authorize the Commission to verify all
information provided on their disclosure forms with all appropriate third parties,
including, but not limited to, financial institutions. The defendants are hereby required,
in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 7701, to furnish the Commission their social security
numbers, which shall be used for purposes of collecting and reporting on any delinquent
amount arising out of such defendant's relationship with the government.
VI. CUSTOMER LISTS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants
Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel, and their
successors, assigns, directors, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all
other persons or entities in active concert or participation with them who receive actual
notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, whether acting directly or through
any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, are permanently restrained
and enjoined from selling, renting, leasing, transferring, or otherwise disclosing the
name, address, telephone number, credit card number, bank account number, e-mail address,
or other identifying information of any person whom defendants charged a fee for arranging
for the provision of a credit card, loan, or other extension of credit. Provided
that defendants may disclose such identifying information to a law enforcement agency or
as required by any law, regulation, or court order.
VII. CEASE COLLECTIONS, NOTICES TO
CONSUMERS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants
Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel, and their
successors, assigns, directors, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all
other persons or entities in active concert or participation with them who receive actual
notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, whether acting directly or through
any corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, shall:
- A. Cease all collection efforts on accounts arising from
contracts, agreements, or understandings between defendants and credit card clients,
including but not limited to:
-
- (1) direct all third parties engaged in collection efforts
regarding such accounts, including TeleCheck Services, Inc., to cease all such collection
activities and to cease furnishing any negative information to any consumer reporting
agencies;
-
- (2) waive, discharge, and release all present and future
legal and equitable claims relating to any payments from TeleCheck Services, Inc.,
including a payment of $8,742, in connection with the collection of such accounts; and
-
- (3) return to TeleCheck Services, Inc. the final payment
totaling $3,916 made by TeleCheck Services, Inc. to defendants in connection with the
collection of such accounts;
-
- B. Within twenty (20) days after the date this Order is
entered, return to credit card clients all uncashed checks or other negotiable
instruments, including checks totaling over $5,800, in defendants' possession that have
been received by defendants, directly or indirectly, on accounts arising from contracts,
agreements, or understandings between defendants and their clients. Include with each such
returned check or other negotiable instrument a notice to the client stating that, as a
result of an agreement between defendants and the Federal Trade Commission settling
allegations regarding defendants' ability to obtain credit cards, those clients' contracts
are rescinded; and
-
- C. Within sixty (60) days after the date this Order is
entered, provide the names and addresses of those clients to whom checks or other
negotiable instruments were returned pursuant to Subparagraph B above to: Regional
Director, Southwest Region, Federal Trade Commission, Suite 2150, 1999 Bryan Street,
Dallas, Texas 75201.
VIII. RECORD KEEPING PROVISIONS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for a period of five (5) years from the
date of entry of this Order, defendants Modern Credit
Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel, and their successors,
assigns, directors, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other
persons or entities in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice
of this Order by personal service or otherwise, whether acting directly or through any
corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with any business
where such defendant is the majority owner of the business or directly or indirectly
manages or controls the business, are hereby restrained and enjoined from failing to
create, and from failing to retain for a period of three (3) years following the date of
such creation, unless otherwise specified:
- A. Books, records and accounts that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the cost of goods or services sold, revenues generated, and the disbursement of such
revenues;
-
- B. Records accurately reflecting: the name, address, and telephone number of each person
employed in any capacity by such business, including as an independent contractor; that
person's job title or position; the date upon which the person commenced work; and the
date and reason for the person's termination, if applicable. The businesses subject to
this Paragraph shall retain such records for any terminated employee for a period of two
(2) years following the date of termination;
-
- C. Records containing the names, addresses, phone numbers, dollar amounts paid, quantity
of items or services purchased, and description of items or services purchased, for all
consumers to whom such business has sold, invoiced or shipped any goods or services, or
from whom such business accepted money or other items of value;
-
- D. Records that reflect, for every consumer complaint or refund request, whether
received directly or indirectly or through any third party:
-
- (1) the consumer's name, address, telephone number and the dollar amount paid by the
consumer;
-
- (2) the written complaint or refund request, if any, and the date of the complaint or
refund request;
-
- (3) the basis of the complaint, including the name of any salesperson complained
against, and the nature and result of any investigation conducted concerning any
complaint;
-
- (4) each response and the date of the response;
-
- (5) any final resolution and the date of the resolution; and
-
- (6) in the event of a denial of a refund request, the reason for the denial; and
-
- E. Copies of all sales scripts, training materials, advertisements, or other marketing
materials utilized; provided that copies of all sales scripts, training
materials, advertisements, or other marketing materials utilized shall be retained for (3)
years after the last date of dissemination of any such materials.
IX. DISTRIBUTION OF ORDER BY DEFENDANTS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for a period of five (5) years from the
date of entry of this Order, defendants Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A.
Hammack, and Robert Hansel shall each:
- A. Provide a copy of this Order to, and obtain a signed and dated acknowledgment of
receipt of same from, each officer or director, each individual serving in a management
capacity, all personnel involved in responding to consumer complaints or inquiries, and
all sales personnel, whether designated as employees, consultants, independent contractors
or otherwise, immediately upon employing or retaining any such persons, for any business
where such defendant is the majority owner of the business or directly or indirectly
manages or controls the business.
-
- B. Maintain for a period of three (3) years after creation, and upon reasonable notice,
make available to representatives of the Commission, the original signed and dated
acknowledgments of the receipt of copies of this Order, as required in Section A of this
Paragraph.
X. COMPLIANCE REPORTING BY DEFENDANTS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in order that compliance with the
provisions of this Order may be monitored:
- A. For a period of five (5) years from the date of entry of this Order, defendants
Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert Hansel shall each
notify the Commission of the following:
-
- (1) Any changes in such defendant's residence, mailing addresses, and telephone numbers,
within ten (10) days of the date of such change;
- (2) Any changes in such defendant's employment status (including self-employment) within
ten (10) days of such change. Such notice shall include the name and address of each
business that defendant is affiliated with or employed by, a statement of the nature of
the business, and a statement of defendant's duties and responsibilities in connection
with the business or employment; and
-
- (3) Any proposed change in the structure of such corporate defendant or any proposed
change in the structure of any business entity owned or controlled by such individual
defendant such as creation, incorporation, dissolution, assignment, sale, merger,
creation, dissolution of subsidiaries, proposed filing of a bankruptcy petition, or change
in the corporate name or address, or any other change that may affect compliance
obligations arising out of this Order, thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of any
proposed change; provided, however, that, with respect to any proposed change in
the corporation about which such defendant learns less than thirty (30) days prior to the
date such action is to take place, such defendant shall notify the Commission as soon as
is practicable after learning of such proposed change;
-
- B. One hundred eighty (180) days after the date of entry of this Order, defendants shall
provide a written report to the FTC, sworn to under penalty of perjury, setting forth in
detail the manner and form in which the defendants have complied and are complying with
this Order. This report shall include but not be limited to:
-
- (1) Defendants' then current residence addresses and telephone numbers;
-
- (2) Individual defendants' then current employment, business addresses and telephone
numbers, a description of the business activities of each such employer, and individual
defendants' title and responsibilities for each employer;
-
- (3) A copy of each acknowledgment of receipt of this Order obtained by defendants
pursuant to Paragraph IX;
-
- (4) A statement describing the manner in which defendants have complied and are
complying with the
-
- (a) Injunctive provisions in Paragraph I of the Order; and
-
- (b) Monetary relief provisions in Paragraph III of the Order;
- C. Upon written request by a representative of the Commission, defendants shall submit
additional written reports (under oath, if requested) and produce documents on fifteen
(15) days' notice with respect to any conduct subject to this Order;
-
- D. For the purposes of this Order, defendants shall, unless otherwise directed by the
Commission's authorized representatives, mail all written notifications to the Commission
to:
-
- Regional Director
Southwest Region
Federal Trade Commission
Suite 2150, 1999 Bryan Street
Dallas, Texas 75201
-
- Re: FTC v. Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., et al.
- Civ. Act. No. 3-99CV11756-G
-
- E. For the purposes of this Paragraph, "employment" includes the performance
of services as an employee, consultant, or independent contractor; and
"employers" includes any individual or entity for whom defendants perform
services as an employee, consultant, or independent contractor; and
-
- F. For purposes of the compliance reporting required by this Paragraph, the Commission
is authorized to communicate directly with defendants.
XI. COMMISSION'S AUTHORITY
TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission is authorized to monitor
defendants' compliance with this Order by all lawful means, including but not limited to,
the following means:
- A. The Commission is authorized, without further leave of court, to obtain discovery
from any person in the manner provided by Chapter V of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26-37, including the use of compulsory process pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 45, for the purpose of monitoring and investigating defendants' compliance with
any provision of this Order;
-
- B. The Commission is authorized to use representatives posing as consumers and suppliers
to defendants, defendants' employees, or any other entity managed or controlled in whole
or in part by defendants, without the necessity of identification or prior notice; and
-
- C. Nothing in this Order shall limit the Commission's lawful use of compulsory process,
pursuant to Sections 9 and 20 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § § 49 and 57b-1, to
investigate whether defendants have violated any provision of this Order or Section 5 of
the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45.
XII. ACCESS TO BUSINESS PREMISES
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for a period of five (5) years from the
date of entry of this Order, for the purpose of further determining compliance with this
Order, defendants Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and Robert
Hansel shall permit representatives of the Commission, within three (3) business days of
receipt of written notice from the Commission:
- A. Access during normal business hours to any office, or facility storing documents, of
any business where such defendant is the majority owner of the business or directly or
indirectly manages or controls the business. In providing such access, such defendant
shall permit representatives of the Commission to inspect and copy all documents relevant
to any matter contained in this Order; and shall permit Commission representatives to
remove documents relevant to any matter contained in this Order for a period not to exceed
five (5) business days so that the documents may be inspected, inventoried, and copied;
and
-
- B. To interview the officers, directors, and employees, including all personnel involved
in responding to consumer complaints or inquiries, and all sales personnel, whether
designated as employees, consultants, independent contractors or otherwise, of any
business to which Section A of this Paragraph applies, concerning matters relating to
compliance with the terms of this Order. The person interviewed may have counsel present.
Provided that, upon application of the Commission and for good cause shown,
the Court may enter an ex parte order granting immediate access to defendants'
business premises for the purposes of inspecting and copying all documents relevant to any
matter contained in this Order.
XIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF
RECEIPT OF ORDER BY DEFENDANTS
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within five (5) business days after
receipt by defendants Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack, and
Robert Hansel of this Order as entered by the Court, each defendant shall submit to the
Commission a truthful sworn statement, in the form shown on Appendix A hereto, that shall
acknowledge receipt of this Order.
XIV. LIFT OF ASSET FREEZE
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the freeze of the defendants' assets,
imposed in the Preliminary Injunction entered in this proceeding, shall be lifted upon the
entry of this Final Judgment.
XV. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this
matter for the purpose of enabling the parties to apply to the Court at any time for such
further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate for the interpretation,
modification or enforcement of this Order, or for the punishment of violations thereof.
The parties hereby consent to the terms and conditions of the Stipulated Final Judgment
and Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Relief as set forth above and consent to
entry thereof. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees.
SO ORDERED, this 4th day of May, 2000.
_______________________________
A. Joe Fish
United States District Judge
SO STIPULATED:
Gary D. Kennedy
Oklahoma Bar No. 01365300
Southwest Region
Federal Trade Commission
Suite 2150, 1999 Bryan Street
Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 979-9379 (office)
(214) 953-3079 (facsimile)
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc.
by Matthew A. Hammack, President
DEFENDANT
Matthew A. Hammack, individually and as
an officer of Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc.
DEFENDANT
Robert Hansel, individually and as an officer
of Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc.
DEFENDANT
Robert M. Cady
Texas Bar Card No. 03588000
1700 Commerce, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 651-0000 (voice)
(214) 747-1110 (facsimile)
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
MODERN CREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES,
INC., a corporation,
MATTHEW A. HAMMACK, individually and as an officer and director of the
corporation, and
ROBERT HANSEL, individually and as an officer and director of the
corporation, Defendants.
Civil Action No. 3-99CV1756-G
AFFIDAVIT OF [NAME OF DEFENDANT]
[Name of defendant], being duly sworn, hereby states and affirms as follows:
- 1. My name is [______]. My social security number is [_____]. My current residence
address is [_____]. I am a citizen of the United States and am over the age of eighteen. I
have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Affidavit.
-
- 2. I am a defendant in FTC v. Modern Financial Services, Inc., et al., Civil
Action No. 3-99CV1746-G in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Texas, Dallas Division.
-
- 3. On __________ ___, 2000, I received a copy of the Stipulated Final Judgment and Order
for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Relief, which was signed by the Honorable A. Joe
Fish and entered by the Court on __________ ___, 2000. A true and correct copy of the
Order I received is attached to this Affidavit.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on ____________ ___, 2000, at ______.
__________________________________
Name of Defendant
State of ____________________, City of ____________________
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this _____ day of _________, 2000.
_____________________________
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
_____________________________ |