UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In the Matter of WFS ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a THE CASH NURSERY, a corporation, and RABB SABIN, and ARTHUR SMITH, individually and as officers of the corporation. DOCKET NO. COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that WFS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a The Cash Nursery, a corporation, and Rabb Sabin and Arthur Smith, individually and as officers of the corporation ("respondents"), have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1. Respondent WFS Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a The Cash Nursery, is a Nevada corporation with its principal office or place of business at 2914 East Katella, Suite 212, Orange, California 92867. 2. Respondent Rabb Sabin is an officer of the corporate respondent. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, or controls the policies, acts, or practices of the corporation, including the acts or practices alleged in this complaint. His principal office or place of business is the same as that of WFS Enterprises, Inc. 3. Respondent Arthur Smith is an officer of the corporate respondent. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, or controls the policies, acts, or practices of the corporation, including the acts or practices alleged in this complaint. His principal office or place of business is the same as that of WFS Enterprises, Inc. 4. Respondents have advertised, offered for sale, sold, and distributed stock and commodity futures trading training and computer programs to the public. Respondents advise their clients to buy and sell specific commodities futures and/or stock and/or commodities options on a daily or weekly basis. Respondents sell their program and training through their Internet Web site, www.the-cash-nursery.com. 5. The acts and practices of respondents alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44. 6. Respondents have disseminated or have caused to be disseminated Internet advertisements for their commodity and stock option trading programs and training, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibit A, pages 1 through 14. These advertisements contain the following statements:
7. Through the means described in Paragraph 6, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that:
8. Through the means described in Paragraph 6, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that they possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 7, at the time the representations were made. 9. In truth and in fact, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 7, at the time the representations were made. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 8 was, and is, false or misleading. 10. Through the means described in Paragraph 6, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that users of respondents' commodity trading program can reasonably expect to trade with little financial risk. 11. In truth and in fact, users of respondents' commodity and stock option trading program cannot reasonably expect to trade with little financial risk. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 10 was, and is, false or misleading. 12. The acts and practices of respondents as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this day of , 2000, has issued this complaint against respondents. By the Commission. Donald S. Clark SEAL |