012 3116 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In the Matter of ESRIM VE SHEVA HOLDING
CORPORATION, a corporation, sometimes doing business as GADGET
UNIVERSE, and COMPLAINT The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corporation, sometimes doing business as Gadget Universe, and Alexander Elnekaveh, individually and as an officer of the corporation ("respondents"), have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges: 1a. Respondent Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp. is a New York corporation with its principal office or place of business at 9408 Owensmouth Ave., Chatsworth, California 91311. 1b. Respondent Alexander Elnekaveh is an officer of the corporate respondent. Individually or in concert with others he formulates, directs, or controls the policies, acts, or practices of the corporation, including the acts or practices alleged in this complaint. His principal office or place of business is the same as that of Esrim Ve Sheva Holding Corp. 2. Respondents have advertised, offered for sale, sold, and distributed products to the public, including Super FuelMAX, an automotive aftermarket fuel-line magnet device. 3. The acts and practices of respondents alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 4. Respondents have disseminated or have caused to be disseminated advertisements for the Super FuelMAX, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibits A, B, and C. These advertisements contain the following statements:
5. Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that, when applied to the fuel line in a motor vehicle, Super FuelMAX:
6. Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that they possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 5, at the time the representations were made. 7. In truth and in fact, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated the representations set forth in Paragraph 5, at the time the representations were made. Therefore, the representation set forth in Paragraph 6 was, and is, false or misleading. 8. Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that tests performed at a certified EPA laboratory prove that Super FuelMAX:
9. In truth and in fact, tests performed at a certified EPA laboratory do not prove that Super FuelMAX:
Therefore, the representations set forth in Paragraph 8 were, and are, false or misleading. 10. Through the means described in Paragraph 4, respondents have represented, expressly or by implication, that a testimonial from respondent Alexander Elnekaveh appearing in the advertisements for Super FuelMAX reflects:
11. In truth and in fact, a testimonial from respondent Alexander Elnekaveh appearing in the advertisements for Super FuelMAX does not reflect:
Therefore, the representations set forth in Paragraph 10 were, and are, false or misleading. 12. The acts and practices of respondents as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices, in or affecting commerce, in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this day of , 2001, has issued this complaint against respondents. By the Commission. Donald S. Clark SEAL: |