The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20200333: Chicago Pacific Founders Fund II,LP; Andrew Smith
20200334: Chicago Pacific Founders Fund II,LP; Peter Smith
Federal Trade Commission's Statement of Public Interest
Statement of Commissioner Rohit Chopra In the Matter of the University of Phoenix, Inc.
Concurring Statement of Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter In the Matter of the University of Phoenix, Inc.
FTC Comment to Texas Medical Board on Its Proposed Rule 193.13 to Add Supervision Requirements for Texas-Certified Nurse Anesthetists
20200324: Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund X, L.P.; Hologic, Inc.
20200339: Acciona, S.A.; Nordex SE
20200344: Harry B. Matthews, Jr. Revocable Trust; LFJR 2012 Dynasty LP
20200345: RCP Artemis Co-Invest, LP; Ladenburg Thalmann Financial Services Inc.
20200355: Genstar BI Gen Holdings, L.P.; UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
20200281: Marubeni Corporation; Aircastle Limited
20200293: Givaudan, S.A.; Estate of Kenneth G. Voorhees, Jr.
20200315: Universal Corporation; James P. Early
20200316: Sonoco Products Company; ESCO Technologies Inc.
20200318: Penelope Group Holdings, LP; Dean V. and Darcy R. Christal
UrthBox, Inc., In the Matter of
According to the agency’s April 2019 complaint, UrthBox violated the FTC Act by misrepresenting that positive consumer reviews on the BBB’s and other websites reflected the independent experiences or opinions of impartial consumers, while the reviewers actually had a material connection to the company. The FTC alleged that UrthBox did not adequately disclose that some consumers received compensation, including free snack boxes, to post those positive reviews. The final order settling the FTC’s charges bars the respondents from engaging in similar conduct and requires them to pay $100,000 to the FTC. In December 2019, the FTC returned more than $84,000 to compensate consumers charged after signing up for the trial offer.