The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20161106: Stichting Administratiekantoor Westend; Clearlake Capital Partners III, L.P.
20161131: GI Partners Fund IV L.P.; Far Niente Wine Estates LLC
Letter From Alexis Gilman, Asst. Director, Mergers IV Division, Bureau of Competition, To Cynthia Dellinger, Esq., Asst. General Counsel, West Virginia Health Care Authority, And To Douglas Davis, Esq., Asst. Attorney General, State of West Virginia
20160999: Kestra Financial Holdings LP; Madison Dearborn Capital Partners VI-A, L.P.
20161047: Huatai Securities Co., Ltd.; AqGen Liberty Holdings LLC
20161048: Allergan plc; Sosei Group Corporation
20161094: Linsalata Capital Partners Fund VI, L.P.; Eliezer Elbaz
20161095: Linsalata Capital Partners Fund VI, L.P.; Sol Bonan
20161100: Genstar Capital Partners VII, L.P.; Windjammer Senior Equity Fund III, L.P.
20161105: ABRY Partners VIII, L.P.; Oliver Street Dermatology Holdings, LLC
20161114: Mitel Networks Corporation; Polycom, Inc.
20161112: Polaris Investment Holdings, L.P.; MPH Acquisition Holdco, L.P.
20161028: JANA Offshore Partners, Ltd.; Team Health Holdings, Inc.
20161029: JANA Nirvana Offshore Fund, Ltd.; Team Health Holdings, Inc.
1605004 Informal Interpretation
Staples/Office Depot
The FTC issued an administrative complaint and authorized staff to seek a preliminary injunction to enjoin the transaction pending the results of the administrative proceeding, charging that Staples, Inc.’s proposed $6.3 billion acquisition of Office Depot, Inc. would significantly reduce competition nationwide in the market for “consumable” office supplies sold to large business customers for their own use. The complaint alleges that, in competing for contracts, both Staples and Office Depot can provide the low prices, nationwide distribution and combination of services and features that many large business customers require. The complaint further alleges that, by eliminating the competition between Staples and Office Depot, the transaction would lead to higher prices and reduced quality, and that entry or expansion into the market – by other office supplies vendors, manufacturers, wholesalers, or online retailers – would not be timely, likely, or sufficient to counteract the anticompetitive effects of the merger. On May 19, 2016, Staples and Office Depot abandoned their proposed merger after the district court granted the Commission’s request for a preliminary injunction. FTC dismissed the case from administrative trial process.