The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20141378: Trian Star Trust; E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company
20141411: ABRY Partners VII, L.P.; KORE Wireless Group Inc.
20141439: FR XII Charlie AIV, L.P.; PDC Energy, Inc.
20141444: Wind Point Partners VII-A, L.P.; Caroline Hunt Trust Estate
20141446: Boat NP Newco, Inc.; Journal Communications, Inc.
20141447: The E.W. Scripps Company; Journal Communications, Inc.
20141451: Tiptree Financial Partners, L.P.; Fortegra Financial Corporation
20141454: One Equity Partners Secondary Fund, L.P.; JPMorgan Chase & Co.
20141458: FMI Associates, L.L.C.; Corsicana Bedding, Inc.
20141459: Caxton Global Investments Limited; Fortune Brands Home and Security, Inc.
20141461: Natural Resource Partners L.P.; Trilantic Capital Partners IV L.P.
20141471: Rhone Offshore Partners IV L.P.; Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
National Association of Teachers of Singing, Inc.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment; Proposed Consent Agreement
InstantUPCCodes.com, In the Matter of
Nationwide Barcode, In the Matter of
Two Internet resellers of UPC barcodes used by retailers for price scanning and inventory purposes, have settled charges that they violated the FTC Act by inviting competitors to join in a collusive scheme to raise the prices charged for barcodes sold online. In separate complaints, the FTC charged that InstantUPCCodes.com and its principal, Jacob J. Alifraghis, and 680 Digital, Inc., d/b/a Nationwide Barcode and its principal, Philip B. Peretz violated the FTC Act by inviting competitors to collude to raise prices for barcodes sold over the Internet. The Commission charges Instant and Nationwide with inviting an agreement to raise prices in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. The FTC has not alleged, however, that the invitations to collude resulted in an agreement on price or other terms of competition. The proposed orders setting the complaints against Instant and Nationwide and their respective principals are designed to remedy the anticompetitive conduct. Specifically, the proposed orders bar Instant and Nationwide from communicating with their competitors about barcode rates or prices; entering into, participating in, maintaining, organizing, implementing, enforcing, inviting, offering, or soliciting an agreement with any competitor to divide markets, allocate consumers, or fix prices; and urging any competitor to raise, fix, or maintain price or to limit or reduce the terms or levels of service they provide.