The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
2204005 Informal Interpretation
16 Part 310: Telemarketing Sales Rule; Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
American Securities Partners/Ferro; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
Clarence L. Werner, U.S. v.
Clarence L. Werner, founder of the Omaha, Nebraska-based truckload carrier Werner Enterprises, Inc. will pay a $486,900 civil penalty to settle charges that certain of his acquisitions of company stock while he was a director of the company violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. The HSR Act requires companies and individuals to report stock purchases over a certain threshold to the FTC and DOJ and wait before closing the transaction so that the federal agencies can investigate the potential competitive impact of the acquisition. Smaller transactions may also be reportable under the Act due to the need to aggregate the new purchase with all current holdings.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension (Telemarketing Sales Rule)
2204004 Informal Interpretation
2204001 Informal Interpretation
2204003 Informal Interpretation
Statement of Commissioners Noah Joshua Phillips and Christine S. Wilson Regarding the Commission's Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Request to Congress
Walmart, U.S. v.
The FTC sued Kohl’s, Inc. and Walmart, Inc. for falsely marketing dozens of rayon textile products as bamboo. Both companies also are charged with making deceptive environmental claims, touting that the “bamboo” textiles were made using ecofriendly processes, while in reality converting bamboo into rayon requires the use of toxic chemicals and results in hazardous pollutants. The court orders settling the complaint require the companies to stop making deceptive green claims or using other misleading advertising, and pay penalties of $2.5 million and $3 million, respectively.
Simply Gum, Inc. (Simply Gum chewing gum)
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., d/b/a D&B
To settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it engaged in deceptive and unfair practices, Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) has agreed to an order requiring substantial changes in the firm’s operations that will benefit small- and mid-sized businesses. Under the proposed order, D&B will also provide refunds to certain businesses that purchased the company’s products in the belief that using the products would improve their business credit scores and ratings.