The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC’s case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
20100878: Biovail Corporation; Valeant Pharmaceuticals International
20100856: Marfrig Alimentos S.A.; LGB Keystone LLC
MCS Programs, LLC, also d/b/a Mutual Consolidated Savings, et al.
Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission On Consumer Privacy
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.; Analysis of the Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
Nestle' HealthCare Nutrition, Inc.; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
20100892: Avon Products, Inc.; Gerald A. Kelly, Jr. and Bonnie C. Kelly
20100886: Wayzata Opportunities Fund, LLC; Entegra Power Group LLC
20100881: POSCO; Daewoo International Corporation
20100872: EMC Corporation; Greenplum, Inc.
U-Haul International, Inc., and AMERCO, In the Matter of
U-Haul International, Inc. and its parent company settled FTC charges that they violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by inviting U-Haul’s closest competitor, Avis Budget Group, Inc., to collude on prices for truck rentals. U-Haul and Budget control more than 70 percent of the “do-it-yourself” one-way truck rental business in the United States. The FTC’s complaint alleges that on several occasions between 2006 and 2008, U-Haul tried to increase rates for one-way truck rentals by privately and publicly communicating with Budget, the second-largest truck rental company in the United States. The proposed settlement order against U-Haul and its parent company AMERCO bars them from inviting a competitor to divide markets, allocate customers, or fix prices, as well as participating in, maintaining, organizing, implementing, enforcing, offering, or soliciting any other company to engage in such conduct.