Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
TLD Network Ltd., Quantum Management (GB) Ltd., TBS Industries Ltd., Thomas Goolnik, and Edward Harris Goolnik
South Georgia Health Partners, et al., In the Matter of
A Georgia physician-hospital organization and its other associated physician groups settled charges that they entered into agreements to fix physician and hospital prices and refused to deal with insurance companies, except on collectively agreed-upon terms.
Peoples Credit First, LLC., et al.; FTC
OSI Financial Services, Inc. and Mark Diamond
ArtMart Publications, Inc., and Arthur Nidetz
Green, Clinton R., d/b/a The Police Bulletin, State Police Magazine, et al.
Polygram Holding, Inc.; Decca Music Group Limited, et al., In the Matter of
1st Beneficial Credit Services LLC, et al.
9068-8425 Quebec, INC. d/b/a Bio Lab, Cellu-Fight, and Quick Slim, and Jean-Francois Brochu
Minnesota Transport Services Association
A consent order settled charges that the household goods movers association filed collectively established rate tariffs for its members in Minnesota, conduct that was not protected by the state action doctrine because the conduct was not actively supervised by the state. According to the complaint, the MTSA filed collectively set rates on behalf of its 89 members, which had the effect of fixing prices of household goods moves, and restricting price competition to the detriment of consumers.
Iowa Movers and Warehousemen's Association, In the Matter of
The Iowa Movers and Warehousemen’s Association agreed to stop certain conduct to settle allegations that it filed collectively established tariffs for intrastate moving rates in Iowa - a practice which did not meet the requirements of the state action doctrine because the conduct was not actively supervised by the state.