<p>Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding. </p>
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and CrossAmerica Partners LP
Retail fuel station and convenience store operator Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and its affiliate CrossAmerica Partners LP agreed to divest 10 fuel stations in Minnesota and Wisconsin to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that ACT’s proposed acquisition of Holiday Companies would violate federal antitrust law. The FTC later alleged that they violated a 2018 order requiring divestitures of 10 retail fuel stations in Minnesota and Wisconsin to Commission-approved buyers no later than June 15, 2018. They agreed to pay a $3.5 million civil penalty to the FTC to settle the allegations.
Miniclip, In the Matter of
In May 2020, the Commission accepted for public comment a proposed consent agreement to resolve allegations that Miniclip S.A. violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by misrepresenting its status in a Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) safe harbor program.
Statement of the Commission In the Matter of Alimentation Couche-Tard and CrossAmerica Partners, LP, Docket No. C-4635, File No. 181 0227
Ceres Turf, Inc. (Miniquad turf aeration tines)
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter In Re FTC-DOJ Vertical Merger Guidelines
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Rohit Chopra Regarding the Publication of the Vertical Merger Guidelines
Statement of Chairman Joseph Simons, Commissioner Noah Joshua Phillips, and Commissioner Christine S. Wilson Regarding Joint Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Vertical Merger Guidelines
Effen Ads, LLC (iCloudWorx)
The operators of a work-from-home scheme and the CEO of their main affiliate marketing network agreed to pay nearly $1.5 million to settle Federal Trade Commission allegations that they used misleading spam emails to lure consumers into buying work-from-home services.