Displaying 2161 - 2180 of 4733
FTC Amicus Brief Urges Appeals Court to Reverse District Court’s Dismissal of Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
FTC Requires Parent Company of Bausch + Lomb to Divest Paragon
16110002 Informal Interpretation
16110001 Informal Interpretation
FTC and DOJ Seek Public Comment on Proposed Revisions to International Antitrust Guidelines
Statement from Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition Director on Appeals Court Decision to Remand Advocate/North Shore Hospital Merger Case to District Court for Further Action
FTC Approves Modified Final Order Preserving Competition among Supermarkets in Seven States
FTC Files Joint Amicus Brief with U.S. Department of Justice in Supreme Court Cases Involving Visa and MasterCard
Investment Firm Founder Fayez Sarofim to Pay $720,000 to Settle FTC Charges For Violation of U.S. Premerger Notification Requirements
In the Supreme Court of the United States: Visa Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sam Osborn, et al., and Visa Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Mary Stoumbos, et al., On Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals For the District of Columbia Circuit
1610008 Informal Interpretation
Caledonia Investments plc
Investment trust Caledonia Investments plc agreed to pay $480,000 in civil penalties to resolve charges that it violated federal premerger reporting laws by failing to report its purchase in 2014 of voting shares in the helicopter services company Bristow Group, Inc. According to the complaint, in June 2008, Caledonia first acquired voting shares in Bristow and reported its purchase to U.S. antitrust authorities, as required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. Subsequently, Caledonia made additional purchases that were exempt from reporting under HSR rules. During that same timeframe, however, two Caledonia employees were designated to serve on Bristow’s board. Bristow awards restricted-stock voting securities to its board members, and by agreement, it set aside the securities for the two Caledonia board members for purchase by Caledonia. In February 2014, these voting shares vested, and Caledonia acquired them, according to the complaint. The Commission charged that Caledonia was required under the HSR Act to report this purchase but failed to do so. The HSR Act allows a company that has reported an initial purchase of voting shares to purchase additional voting shares from the same issuer – as long as those purchases do not cause the company’s total holdings to cross a higher reporting threshold over a five-year period following the initial purchase. The complaint charges that Caledonia’s 2014 purchase of voting shares in Bristow fell outside the five-year period following its initial purchase.
The Penn State Hershey Medical Center/PinnacleHealth System, In the Matter of
The Commission issued an administrative complaint alleging that the combination of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System would substantially reduce competition for general acute care inpatient hospital services in the area surrounding Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and lead to reduced quality and higher health care costs for the area’s employers and residents. The Commission also authorized staff to file a preliminary injunction to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of its administrative proceeding.
1610006 Informal Interpretation
FTC and DOJ Release Guidance for Human Resource Professionals on How Antitrust Law Applies to Employee Hiring and Compensation
Prepared Remarks of Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen, "The FTC PAE Study in Context"
Displaying 2161 - 2180 of 4733