Displaying 3061 - 3080 of 4737
Protecting Consumer Welfare in the U.S. Health Care Sector
FTC Puts Conditions on Honeywell's Acquisition of Scan Engine Manufacturer Intermec
FTC Seeks Public Comment on Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.’s Application to Divest Ameristar Casinos, Inc.’s Assets in Lake Charles, Louisiana to GNLC Holdings, Inc.
FTC Staff Issues Advisory Opinion That Information Exchange Program Proposed by United States Money Transmitters Is Unlikely to Harm Competition and May Enhance Consumer Protection Goals
FTC Approves Final Order Settling Charges that General Electric's Acquisition of Avio Aviation's Business Would be Anticompetitive in Market for Airbus’s A320neo Aircraft Engines
General Electric Company, In the Matter of
The FTC charged that GE’s proposed acquisition of Avio would substantially lessen competition in the sale of engines for the A320neo aircraft, which would result in higher prices, reduced quality, and engine delivery delays for A320neo customers. GE -- through CFM International, its joint venture with France’s Snecma S.A. -- and Pratt & Whitney are the only two firms that manufacture engines for Airbus’s A320neo aircraft. Avio designs a critical component -- the accessory gearbox or AGB -- for Pratt & Whitney’s PW1100G engine. Pratt & Whitney has no viable alternatives to Avio for development of the AGB for the PW1100G engine. According to the FTC, GE's acquisition of Avio would give GE the ability and incentive to disrupt the design and certification of Avio’s AGB for the PW1100G engine used on A320neo aircraft. The FTC order remedies the acquisition’s likely anticompetitive effects by removing GE’s ability and incentive to disrupt Avio’s AGB work during the design, certification, and initial production ramp-up phase
Hospital Authority and Phoebe Putney Health System Settle FTC Charges That Acquisition of Palmyra Park Hospital Violated U.S. Antitrust Laws
FTC Submits Proposed Amicus Brief Concerning “No-Authorized-Generic” Commitments in Drug Companies’ Patent Settlements
FTC Seeks Public Comment on Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s Request to Modify Final Decision and Order, Divestiture Agreement Related to 2012 Acquisition of El Paso Corp.
FTC Requires Pinnacle to Sell Two Casino Properties as Condition for Acquiring Rival Ameristar
FTC Approves Final Order Settling Allegations That Tesoro’s Acquisition of Chevron Petroleum Assets Was Anticompetitive
FTC Testifies Before Congress on Standard Essential Patents and How Patent "Hold-Up" Affects Competition
Section 5: Principles of Navigation
FTC Finalizes Settlement in Google Motorola Mobility Case
Motorola Mobility LLC, and Google Inc., In the Matter of
To settle charges that it violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by engaging in unfair methods of competition and unfair acts or practices related to the licensing of standard essential patents (SEPs) for cellular, video codec, and wireless LAN stanards, Google Inc. agreed to change some of its business practices. Under a settlement reached with the FTC, Google agreed to meet its prior commitments to allow competitors access – on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms – to patents on critical standardized technologies needed to make popular devices such as smart phones, laptop and tablet computers, and gaming consoles.
Statement of Chairwoman Edith Ramirez on “Pay-for- Delay” Settlements
Displaying 3061 - 3080 of 4737