Every year the FTC brings hundreds of cases against individuals and companies for violating consumer protection and competition laws that the agency enforces. These cases can involve fraud, scams, identity theft, false advertising, privacy violations, anti-competitive behavior and more. The Legal Library has detailed information about cases we have brought in federal court or through our internal administrative process, called an adjudicative proceeding.
Red Ventures Holdco and Bankrate, In the Matter of
Red Ventures and Bankrate agreed to divest Bankrate’s Caring.com business unit to settle FTC charges that their $1.4 billion merger would likely harm competition in the market for third-party paid referral service for senior living facilities. According to a complaint filed by the FTC, Red Ventures and Bankrate supply proprietary internet content and customer leads for a variety of industries. Caring.com is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bankrate, while two of Red Ventures’ largest shareholders jointly own A Place for Mom.com, the largest provider of such services. According to FTC’s complaint, Caring.com and A Place for Mom.com are each other’s closest competitors, competing for national and local business. The complaint alleges that the two Red Venture shareholders have the collective ability to significantly influence management of Red Venture and Caring.com. Thus, if consummated, the transaction may increase the chance for Red Ventures to unilaterally exercise market power and the potential for coordinated interaction between Caring.com and A Place for Mom. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the parties will divest Caring.com no later than six months after the acquisition and provide transition services to an FTC-approved buyer.
Benjamin Moore & Co., Inc., In the Matter of
YOLO Colorhouse, In the Matter of
ICP Construction, Inc, In the Matter of
Imperial Paints, In the Matter of
Oregon Lithoprint, Inc. (News-Register), In the Matter of
Telomerase Activation Sciences, Inc. and Noel Thomas Patton, In the Matter of
Bollman Hat Company, In the Matter of
Seven & i Holdings, 7-Eleven and Sunoco, In the Matter of
Agrium Inc., Potash Corporation, and Nutrien Ltd., In the Matter of
Becton, Dickinson and Company / C.R. Bard, Inc., In the Matter of
Cowboy AG LLC, In the Matter of
Victory Media, G.I. Jobs, and Military Friendly, In the Matter of
Integra Lifesciences and Johnson & Johnson, In the Matter of
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, In the Matter of
Tthe FTC required Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA to sell 60 outpatient dialysis clinics in 43 local markets under a proposed settlement resolving charges that its acquisition of rival dialysis provider Liberty Dialysis Holdings, Inc. would harm competition in numerous local markets for outpatient dialysis services around the country. According to the FTC, Fresenius's acquisition of Liberty would eliminate head-to-head competition between the firms in the 43 markets at issue, leading to higher prices and reduced quality for dialysis consumers.