Skip to main content
Date
Rule
Item 4(c)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
None noted

Question

(redacted)

October 23, 2000

BY FACSIMILE

Michael Verne

Federal Trade Commission

Premerger Notification Office

Room 303

Washington, D.C. 20580

Re: (redacted) Corporation 4(c) Document Search

Dear Mr. Verne:

This letter will confirm our telephone conversation on October 19, 2000 regarding the preparation of the Hart-Scott-Rodino filing in connection with ( redacted ) proposed acquisition (redacted). Specifically, (redacted) and I phoned you to discuss the scope of the 4(c) search, in light of certain facts and circumstances regarding previous negotiations between (redacted) and (redacted) that broke down in June 1999. Both (redacted) and (redacted) sought advice about whether the facts in this evidence a "clean break" between negotiations, so that the 4(c) search in connection with this transaction can be properly limited to recent negotiations, not including the time period in which there were prior unsuccessful negotiations.

During our phone conversation, we advised you that last year (redacted) and (redacted) engaged in negotiations that resulted in an offer by (redacted) to acquire (redacted). On (redacted) (redacted) Board of Directors met and rejected (redacted) offer. All of these event, including the breakdown of negotiations and rejection of the offer, were widely reported in newspapers and documents in (redacted) internal Board minutes.

Many months passed where there were no further substantive discussion between the parties with respect to any potential merger, acquisition or other combination. Some time between April and June of this year, high level discussion about a potential merger of acquisition took place between the parties' Chairmen. As a result of these discussion and negotiations (redacted) and (redacted) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 15, 2000.

Based on the facts that we discussed, you advised us that there is enough evidence to support a "clean break" in negotiations that occurred between the parties in 1999 and the current transaction. Consequently, submission of 4(c) documents in connection with this transaction properly excludes document prepared in connection with the unsuccessful negotiations that ended in June 1999. Of course, if there are any materials that were generated during the 1999 negotiations that were used and attached to 4(c) documents create during current negotiations we will submit those document as well.

Please contact me promptly at (redacted) in the event that your understanding of our telephone discussion varies in any way from mine. We truly appreciate you time in addressing this important issue.

Sincerely Yours,

(redacted)

cc: (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.