Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.30
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree - would also be exempt under (c)(3)

Question

[redacted]

December 12, 2000

Michael Verne

Federal Trade Commission

Premerger Notification Office

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20580

Re:802.30 of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Regulations

Dear Mr. Verne:

This letter is to confirm our telephone conference on Friday, December 8th. I

called you with a hypothetical involving two inter-related, simultaneous acquisitions, one of

which we believe to be exempt from filing under of the Hart-Scott-Rodino

Regulations. The hypothetical went as follows:

Company A (A) owns 100% of Company C (C). A will acquire 54.3% of the

voting securities of Company B (B). In a simultaneous transaction, B will

acquire 100% of the voting securities of C. Therefore, as a result of the

simultaneous transactions, A will own 54% of the voting securities of B and B

will hold 100% of the voting control of C and acquire control of B.

The issue presented is whether B must file for its acquisition of C, or whether that portion of the

transaction is exempt as an intra person transaction under 16 C.F.R. 802.30.

We agreed that (1) A must file for its acquisition of B and (2) B is under no

obligation to file an HSR form for its acquisition of C, Because the :acquired and acquiring

persons...are the same person. See 16 C.F.R. 802.30. Therefor, the acquisition of C by B is

exempt as an intraperson transaction.

If for whatever reason you feel that this letter does not accurately reflect our

conversation, please let me know, immediately so that we do not proceed in error. Thank you

very much for your time and guidance in this matter.

Sincerely,

[redacted]


About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.