Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.51 801.15
Staff
Patrick Sharpe
Response/Comments
B. Michael Verne 2/13/01

Question

February 16, 2001

Patrick Sharp, a~
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
6th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mr. Sharp:

I write to confirm our telephone conversation of today with respect to the )-Hart-Scott Rodino exemption for the following transaction. Our client (redacted) an ultimate parent entity headquartered in (redacted) and incorporated under the laws of Germany (redacted) intends to acquire from (redacted), an ultimate parent entity headquartered in (redacted) Switzerland, and incorporated under the laws of Switzerland (redacted) certain foreign assets held by non-U.S. subsidiaries of (redacted) valued in excess of US$50 million; (ii) all of the voting securities of two other non-U.S. subsidiaries of (redacted) valued in excess of US$15 million; and (iii) all of the voting securities of a U.S. subsidiary of (redacted) of Houston, Texas, a U.S. company indirectly controlled by (redacted) valued at approximately US$1.2 million. The closing is expected to occur in late April, 2001.

The U.S, sales (redacted) are less than $17 million for fiscal year 2000 and are not forecast to substantially exceed that amount for the year 2001. The assets of (redacted) total approximately US $20 million. Neither the foreign (redacted) assets to be acquire (point (1) above) nor the foreign (redacted) subsidiaries whose voting stock will be acquired (point (ii) above) have any sales in or into the U.S. other than the $17 million sales of ~$17 million for fiscal year 2000

We have concluded that the transaction falls below the $50 million minimum size-of the-transaction in the U.S. reflected in the amendment to the statute, 15 U.S. Code 18a, which took effect February 1, 2001, and therefore, that U.S. premerger reporting is not required.

Rule 801.15(a) states that exempt acquisitions of assets and voting securities are deemed not held as a result of the acquisition. The purchase of the foreign assets is exempt because they are not located in the U.S. and do not account for any sales in or into the U.S. other than the $17 million (redacted). The purchase of (redacted) foreign subsidiaries is likewise exempt because they have no sales in the U.S. and do not own or control any U.S. assets. As a result, the total value of the R purposes is only approximately $1.2 million, the value of the shares of (redacted). No premerger report in the U.S. is required because such an acquisition does not meet the minimum $50 million size-of-the transaction test.

Thank you for taking the time to speak with me. If you wish to reach me, my contact coordinates are: telephone (redacted), fax (redacted) and e-mail (redacted).

Sincerely,

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.