Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.50
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
N. Ovuka concurs

Question

March 22, 2001

VIAFACSIMILE

MichaelVerne
Federal Trade Commission
Premerger Office
Room 314
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington,D.C. 20580

Re: InquiryConcerning 802.50(b) Exemption

DearMike-

I am writing to confirm my understanding of the advice yougave me during our telephone conversation of March 16, 2001, concerning the applicationof 16 CF.R. 80250(b). Company A is a United States personwith (1) assets located in the United States with an aggregate book value in excess of $15 million and(2) annual sales in the United States of more than $25 million in its most recent fiscalyear. Company B Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company B, will mergewith and into Company A, with Company A surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiaryof Company B. In consideration for their Company A voting securities,shareholders of Company A will receive both voting securities in Company B andcash. Company B is a foreign issuer. Before the merger, Company Bdoes not hold assets located in the United States with an aggregate book valuein excess of $15 million and does not make aggregate sales in or into theUnited States of $25 million or more.

According to our telephone conversation, it is myunderstanding that the analysis of whether the 16 C.F.R. 802.50(b)exemption would apply to the acquisition of Company B securities by Company Astockholders is based on the United States holdings and sales of Company Bbefore the consummation of the transaction. In the case at issue, becausepremerger Company B does not hold assets located in the United States with anaggregate book value in excess of $15 million or more, and did not makeaggregate sales in or into the United States of $25 million or more in its mostrecent fiscal year, the C.F.R. 802.50(b) exemption would apply to theacquisition of Company B voting securities by Company A shareholders in themerger.

Pleaseconfirm that my understanding is correct. I can be reached at (redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.