Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.2
Staff
B. Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Upon further discussion with the writer, the issue became whether the transfer of certain royalty rights from licenses which these . . . were not being transferred for cash consideration constituted the acquisition of an asset. The licenses involved were non-exclusive licenses to the use of I.P for certain pharmaceutical products under development. Advised that the transfer of the royalty rights (essentially a revenue stream that had already been created) for consideration would continue the transfer of an asset for HSR purposes. NOTE: This does not address the transfer of an existing non-exclusive license for consideration.

Question

From: (redacted)

To: mverne@ftc.gov

Date: 12/03/01 4:01 PM

Subject: Question

The short version of my voicemail question is whether transfer of an existing non-exclusive license to intellectual property is a potentially reportable asset acquisition. Seems to me that answer is either yes, because the transferor is parting with all of its rights under an existing contract, or no, because a non-exclusive intellectual property license isnt an asset for HSR purposes.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.