Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.1
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
The 801.13 discussion below is irrelevant. The issue is whether the two portfolios, in combination, represent an operating unit. It is the representation of the writer that they do not; and therefore the acquisition of the two portfolios is exempt under the ordinary course of business exemption.

Question

March 21, 2002

BY E-MAIL TO MVERNE@FTC.GOV

B. Michael Verne

Federal Trade Commission

Premerger Notification Office

Washington, D.C.

Dear Mike:

I'm writing to confirm my understanding of a discussion we had last week, which concluded that a transaction would fall within the "ordinary course of business" exemption under Section 802.1.

Here are the material facts. [Redacted] Corp., a diversified energy-marketing company operating through various affiliates and subsidiaries, including its wholly owned subsidiaries, [redacted], [redacted], and [redacted]. [Redacted] Corp. was the ultimate parent entity of all three companies. All of these entities have filed under Chapter 11, and this letter refers to them all collectively as [Entity].

[Entity] currently plans to attempt to dispose of substantial portions of its portfolio of retail and wholesale [redacted] contracts as well as its [redacted] contracts. [Entity] has announced its intentions to develop a plan of reorganization, but such a plan has not yet been finalized. Accordingly, [Entity] is unable to assess whether, and in what manner, it might continue in, or subsequently re-enter any [redacted] contract market.

[Entity], through the three subsidiaries named above, has negotiated two separate sales of [redacted] contract portfolios to the same buyer. One sale is for a wholesale [redacted] contract with related management and supply arrangements. The second is for a portfolio of multiple retail [redacted] contracts, together with related marketing rights and a master service arrangement with a local utility. Each transaction is less than $50 million, but together, they exceed that threshold. The closings are scheduled within a short time period (less than 180 days apart).

Each sale consists exclusively of the [redacted] contract rights and related arrangements described above; it does not include any part of any operating unit or division, personnel contracts, or any part of any infrastructure of [Entity].

Based on these facts, I understand that the Premerger Notification Office interprets Section 802.1 to mean that each sale independently qualifies for the ordinary course of business exemption; that, since each sale is separately exempt, no aggregation is required under Section 801.13 or any other section; and that this exemption, interpreted in this way, would apply even to the sale of the last contract in any of [Entity]s portfolios.

If this letter correctly summarizes the interpretation you gave me, I would appreciate it if you would please notate this letter accordingly.

Sincerely,

[redacted]

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.