Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.30 801.2
Staff
B. Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Advised that two filings are required in the exchange: A files to acquire the assets from the partnership (B is acquired) B files to acquire the assets A transfers to the partnership (A is acquired) A need not file to acquire the assets it is contributing to the partnership as an acquiring person

Question

From: (redacted)
To: Mike Verne mverne@ftc.gov

Date: 5/16/02 12:06 PM

Subject: HSR Question

Hello Mike. I know that the PNO has made certain changes to eliminate filings that have no potential substantive issue (e.g., elimination of the primary filing where a person acquires 100% of the voting securities of a corporation that owns nothing other than a minority interest in another corporation or partnership). I am wondering if any changes have been made with respect to interperson transactions.

Here's the scenario:

Company A and Company B each own 50% of Partnership C. Company A and a subsidiary partnership of Partnership C (the "partnership") will exchange certain assets. When the exchange is complete, Company A will not hold any new assets. It will hold directly assets that it previously held through Partnership C and will hold through Partnership C assets that it previously held directly. Company B no longer will have an interest in the assets transferred to Company A. Company B will have a new interest in the assets transferred by Company A to the partnership. All jurisdictional tests are satisfied.

In the "old HSR world," Company A would have to file as an acquiring and acquired person for its acquisition of assets from itself and from Company B (i.e., for the acquisition of the assets transferred to it from the partnership and for the acquisition of the assets that it transfers to the partnership). Company B would have to file for its acquisition of the assets transferred by Company A to the partnership. Is the "new HSR world" any more forgiving?

Best regards,

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.