Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.30
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
12/24 Advised that entering into bankruptcy severs the chain of control for HSR purposes. If the transfer of SS1 voting stock to S2 occurs after the bankruptcy, 802.30 is not available. N. Ovuka concurs.

Question

From: (redacted)
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Michael Verne
Subject: Rule 802.30 & Bankruptcy

Michael Verne

Would you please confirm my understanding of the application of the HSR Rules in the following situation.

Corporation A owns Subsidiary 1 (S1). A also owns Subsidiary 2 (S2). S1 owns Sub-Subsidiary 1 (SS1). A intends to cause S1 to sell the stock of SS1 to S2 in a transaction that ordinarily would be exempt from notification under Rule 802:30 (intraperson transactions). However, prior to effecting the transaction, A may have to place S1 into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In bankruptcy, S1 will be a debtor in possession, still controlled by A, and no trustee will be appointed. It is my understanding, although I can find no rule on the subject, that a debtor in possession is considered to be its own UPE. 1 can find no interpretation or rule indicating that the fact that a debtor in possession may be its own UPE would somehow deprive the debtor's controlling parent of the benefit of the Rule 802.30 exemption.

Accordingly, it is my understanding that, under the above facts, A would be entitled to rely on the exemption in Rule 802.30 to complete the transaction above-described.

Would you please confirm at your earliest convenience that my understanding as above-stated is in accordance with the views of the PNO.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.