Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.4, 802.2(d)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
6/2/03 The value of the residential property is excluded from the $50MM limitation in 802.4, not fro the size of transaction. Otherwise agree.

Question

May 29, 2003

Michael Verne
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
7`'' & Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Mike:

I am writing to confirm my understanding of telephone conversations we had on Wednesday, April 30. 2003 and Thursday, May 29, 2003 concerning the potential reportability under the, Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended ("HSR Act"), of a proposed transaction discussed below.

Proposed transition

Our client intends to sell all of the issued and outstanding voting securities of two non-publicly traded and wholly owned subsidiaries- The purchase price will be approximately $5 million payable in cash at closing. The acquiring party also will assume approximately 695 million in debt through the acquisition of the two issuers. The two entities to be acquired invest -- through interests in multiple limited liability corporations, corporations, limited partnerships and limited liability partnerships -- in high quality, affordable housing that qualifies for federal low income housing tax credits. The vast majority of the assets of the two issuers consist of interests in residential property.

Conclusions

You agreed that the value of the proposed transaction falls below the $50 million size of the transaction test, and that the acquisition is therefore not subject to the notification and reporting requirements of the HSR Act. See 15 U.S.C. 18a(a). Specifically, you confirmed that the value for HSR purposes of non-publicly traded voting securities with a determined acquisition price (in this instance approximately $5 million) is the acquisition price. See 16 C.F.R. 801.10(a)(2)(i). You also confirmed the long standing position of the FTC Premerger Notification Office that in determining the acquisition price of voting securities for HSR purposes the value of liabilities being assumed in the acquired entity should be excluded. You stated that the valuation for HSR purposes would not be impacted, such that the transaction would remain exempt, whether the purchase price was described in the purchase agreement as S5 million (with the assumption of $95 million in liabilities) or as $100 million (consisting of a $5 million payment and the assumption of $95 million in liabilities).

You also confirmed that the value of the residential property held by the acquired entities should be excluded in valuing the transaction and that if the acquired issuers (and entities controlled by those issuers) do not hold non-exempt assets with an aggregate fair

If market value of more than $50 million, the transaction is HSR exempt regardless of the acquisition price. See 16 C.F.R. 802.2(d); 16 C.F.R. 802.4. You said that the exemption for residential property would apply even though the issuers to be acquired hold the property through limited liability corporations or other entities. Further, you said that in addition to excluding the value of the residential property in conducting an HSR valuation, it is appropriate to exclude "other related assets" to the residential property, and that tax credits associated with the residential property qualify as such excludable "other related assets."

Please let me know as soon as possible if you disagree with any of the conclusions discussed above, or if I have misunderstood any aspect of your advice. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Sincerely,

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.