Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.3, 802.51, 802.4
Staff
M Verne
Response/Comments
802.51 cannot exempt this since the issuer is US. However if the license is only for rights to oil reserves the transactions can be exempted under 802.3 / 802.4

Question

From: (redacted)
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Verne, Michael
Subject: Possible exemption FOR fOREIGN aSSETS"

Dear Mike

I'm sorry to bother you but I can't reach anyone else and this question is sort of urgent.

--The question is whether a filing is required when a foreign company (no US sales) acquires a US company whose sole asset is its license interest in a foreign oil production operation.

--The oil is sold to unrelated third parties in Europe: It may or may not enter the US, but the company doesn't sell it here.

--802.5(b)(1) (Staff comment 802.51) requires both companies to be foreign, which obviously excludes the US company.

--I guess the question is whether there could be any informal interpretation under any rule on the basis that the US sub has no operations in the US, no sales in the US, and its sole asset is a foreign license. In other words, the purpose of the rules would be met, because, aside from the fact of Delaware incorporation, the target company (though not its large US parent) really has no economic connection with the US.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.