Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.51
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
1. Must determine which office is principal office. 2. a. Yes, b. Yes.

Question

From:(redacted)
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 3:55 PM
To:Verne, B. Michael
Cc:(redacted)
Subject: HSR question

Hi Mike - I amhoping for your guidance on the following fact pattern:

Company A and CompanyB are planning to form a 50/50 Jt. Venture - JV X. Company A and Company B willcontribute European assets to JV X. JV X will conduct business through twoforeign LLC's (Dutch Co - which will be incorporated in the Netherlands andSwiss Co - which will be incorporated in Switzerland)

Company A is aCanadian issuer which was formed under the Canadian Business Corp. Act. CompanyA has about 1/3 of its offices in Canada, 1/3 in the US and 1/3 in Europe.Currently, many of the officers and directors are in the US.

Here are myquestions:

1. Is it safe toassume that Company A is a "foreign person"? The regs say that aforeign person has to be a foreign issuer and its principal offices can not bein the US.

2.Assuming thatboth Company A and Company B are foreign persons:

a) Under 802.51(b), when calculating the $50 million asset and revenue numbers,would we look only to the assets being contributed to the JV (which is theissuer being acquired)?

b) Under 802.51 (c) (2), in calculating the $110 million in or into the US, doyou look at the UPE of Company A and Company B?

I look forward to hearing from you.Thanks

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.