Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree

Question

January 13, 2005

VIAFACSIMILE (202) 326-2624 and U.S. MAIL

Michael B. Verne
Compliance Specialist
Federal Trade Commission
Room 301
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20580

Re: Intraperson Transaction Issue

Dear Michael:

This will confirm our telephoneconversation of this morning, during which you advised me that the following transactionwould not be reportable as it is treated as an intraperson transaction forHart-Scott-Rodino coverage purposes.

Nonprofit corporation Acurrently appoints a majority of the board of directors of nonprofitcorporation B. Pursuant to previous HSR coverageinterpretations of the premerger notification office, A is treated as theparent of B and the two are treated as the same person for HSR purposes.

A and B now propose to reversetheir relationship, whereby B will be granted the ability to appoint the boardof directors of A. For HSR purposes, even if other size relatedtests are met, this is -not a reportable transaction because it is deemed to bean intraperson transaction. This conclusion follows from the fact that A and B are,for HSR purposes, treated as one person bothbefore and after the transaction in question.

If I have misstated yourconclusion and advice in any way, please notify me at your earliestconvenience.

Thank you foryour assistance in this matter.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.