Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.2(c)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
There is no such requirement in the exemption.

Question

From: (redacted)
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 10:57 AM
To: Verne, B. Michael
Subject: Re: HSR - Unproductive Real Property Exemption

Hi Michael:

I am sure youprobably do not remember, but you helped me with some HSR issues this time last year. I appreciated your help very much.

We now have a clientwho is purchasing 160,000 acres of timberland. We think the transaction isexempt from HSR filing requirements under theunproductive real property exemption (802.2(c)). However, the seller insiststhat my client execute a post-closing affidavit stating it is going to managethe timber in the same fashion as the seller did before closing, i.e. on astand level. Seller's counsel insists that such a statement is required under HSR. However, I cannot find the requirement. The only thing I canthink of is that it is somehow important to counting part of the timberland asunproductive.

Can you tell mewhether the purchaser is required by HSR to executethis sort of post closing affidavit, or if not required, that it lends supportto unproductivity? I am stumped.

(redacted)

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.