Skip to main content
Date
Rule
802.10
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree C is exempt under 802.10. A & B do not meet the size-of-transaction.

Question

From: (redacted)

Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 11:05 AM

To: Verne,B. Michael

Subject: HSR Question

Hi, Mike.

I have a questionregarding a restructuring. 3 current shareholders of a target, T, are going toslightly restructure their holdings in T, and they are creating an intermediaryholding company, H, to do so. H does not and will not hold anything elsebesides the shares of T, and some cash that will be used to purchaseoutstanding public shares of T.

The currentshareholders are A, B and C. A and B currently hold 4.3% of the shares of Tdirectly. C holds 71.4% of T directly. The rest of the shares (20%) are public.

A and B willcreate H, and A, B and C will contribute their shares of T to it. A and B willcontribute money to H to buy the outstanding public shares, and will buy someadditional shares in T from C.

After thetransaction is over, the ownership of H will be as follows:

A: 24.5% whichequals $14.6 M in shares in T (indirectly)

B: 24.5% whichequals $14.6 M in shares in T (indirectly)

C: 51 % whichequals $30.3 M in shares in T (indirectly)

Given that Ccontrols H, which controls T, it could be considered to hold 100% of T.However, as C already controlled T, I think no filing is required under802.10(b)(2)(ii) or under 802.21. I think no filings are required for A or Bsince neither acquisition meets the size of transaction test.

I'd be verygrateful if you would confirm that my analysis is correct.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.