Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.13
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree No aggregation would be required.

Question

From: (redacted)

Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 6:23 PM

To: Verne, B. Michael

Subject: RE: HSR Question

Thank you, Mike,for your help on this. One follow-up question if I can.

Assume that a firm obtains anonexclusive IP license (that is not reportable under the HSR Act) as well asan option to later acquire the patent. I understand it, the HSR analysis of thelater acquisition of the patent would look only to consideration paid for theactual acquisition, rather than aggregating the amount previously paid for thenonexclusive license, because that nonexclusive license is not considered anasset for HSR purposes.

In this case please assume that the transaction is notdesigned as a device in avoidance. Rather, the nonexclusive licensee wouldexercise the option to acquire the patent only if necessary to avoid anydispute with third parties regarding its rights to enforce the patent.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.