Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(b), 801.10
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Assuming the brothers are adults and not minors, the sale of Corporation 1 (controlled by Brother X) is a separate transaction from the sales of Corporations 2, 3 and 4 (controlled by Brother Y). Neither would separately satisfy the size-of-transaction test.

Question

From:(redacted)

Sent:Friday, May 18, 2007 10:48 AM

To:Verne, B. Michael

Subject:Application of the Size-of-Transaction Test

Mr. Verne:

Ihave the following question regarding the application of thesize-of-transaction test.

Facts

Individual A is purchasing for cash 100% of the stockof four corporations. All of the stock of the corporations is owned, directlyor indirectly, by three brothers. Corporations 1, 2 and 3 operate automobiledealerships. Corporation 4 owns the real estate on which the other corporationsoperate. There will be a single Stock Purchase Agreement, and the purchase ofthe stock of each of the four corporations will mutually dependent.

Corporation 1 is owned as follows. Limited LiabilityCompany 1 ("LLC

1")owns 2,000 shares of voting common stock and Limited Partnership 1 ("LP1") owns 98,000 shares of non-voting common stock. LLC 1 is thesole general partner of LP 1 and owns a 1% interest. Brother X is the solemember of LLC 1. Thelimited partners of LP 1 are Brother X (79%), an irrevocable trust (with acorporate trustee) created by Brother X for himself and his family (3.5%) and asecond irrevocable trust (with a corporate trustee) created by Brother X forhimself and his family (16.5%).

Corporations 2 and 3 are each owned as follows.Limited Liability Company 2 ("LLC 2")owns 2,000 shares of voting common stock and Limited Partnership 2 ("LP2") owns 98,000 shares of non-voting common stock. LLC 2 is thesole general partner of LP 2 and owns a 1% interest. Brother Y is the solemember of LLC 2. Thelimited partners of LP 2 are an irrevocable trust (with a corporate trustee)created by Brother Y for himself and his family (10.5%) and a secondirrevocable trust (with a corporate trustee) created by Brother Y for himselfand his family (88.5%).

Corporation 4 is owned as follows. Brother Z owns 400shares of voting common and 19,600 shares of non-voting common. LimitedLiability Company 2 ("LLC 2")owns 1,600 shares of voting common stock and Limited Partnership 2 ("LP2") owns 78,400 shares of non-voting common stock. Brother X, who is theultimate parent entity ("UPE") of Corporation1, will receive about$41 million. Brother Y, who I believe would be the UPE of Corporations 2, 3 and4, will receive about $36 million. Brother Z will receive about $6 million.

Question

Forpurposes of the size-of-transaction test, are the sales of the fourcorporations (or in the alternative the sale of Corporation 1, on the one hand,and the sales of Corporations 2, 3 and 4, on the other) treated as separatetransactions, in which case the threshold would not be met?

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.