Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.1(e)(2)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
I agree. If the board held meetings in NY the conclusion would not change.

Question

From: (redacted)

Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 10:53 PM

To: Verne, B. Michael

Subject: Please Confirm; Rule 801.1(e)(2)(ii)

Mike,

Thank you for agreeing to confirmyour oral guidance.

During our call on June 19, youconfirmed that a private equity or hedge fund would be a Foreign Person forRule 801.1(e)(2)(ii) of the HSR Act purposes based on the following indicia:

1.Thefund is a partnership organized under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction (Caymen Islands).

2.Twoof the three directors are either foreign persons or foreign corporations.

3. The fund has no principal office andno offices in the United States.

4. The fund has no officers.

5.TheBoard of the fund (or its equivalent) generally does not have physicalmeetings; actions are undertaken by written consent.

6.Thereis a management company for the fund that is located in New York City. The management company hasdiscretion to make investments on behalf of the fund's investors, but does notControl the fund for HSR Act

purposes.

Please confirm that you agree thatthe above fund is a Foreign Person for HSR Act purposes.

Would your view change if the Boardof the fund (or its equivalent) had meetings located in New York? I assume not, but please confirm.

Havea terrific 4th of July holiday. Thank you.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.