Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.10
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree.

Question

July 26, 2007

Mr. B. Michael Verne

Premerger Notification Office

Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

7th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Dear Mike:

I am writingto confirm my understanding of a telephone conversation we had on July 24, 2007 relating to the applicability ofthe Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended ("HSRAct") to a proposed transaction.

ProposedTransaction

The purchaser isacquiring the stock of two non-publicly traded corporations. Both corporationsare owned by a common parent, the seller, but the parent entity is not beingacquired. The purchaser will pay to seller $80 million at closing, with $60million of that amount to be used by seller to pay off the outstanding debt ofthe two issuers being acquired.

Conclusion

You agreed that theproposed transaction would be HSR exempt as the value of the transaction forHSR purposes would be $20 million, and thus below the $59.8 million size of thetransaction test. See 16 C.F.R. 801.10(a)(2)(i). Specifically, you confirmedthat in this context of the acquisition of non-publicly traded votingsecurities, the value for HSR purposes would be based on the acquisition price,and the acquisition price would not include amounts to pay off the debt of theacquired issuers regardless of whether the buyer paid off the debt directly ortransferred funds to seller at closing for the seller to pay off the debt ofthe issuers to be acquired. You also confirmed that where, as here, two or moreissuers are being acquired by the purchaser from a common parent that theconclusion of non-reportability would not change regardless of how the debt wasallocated among the issuers being acquired.

Please let me knowas soon as possible if you disagree with any of the conclusions discussedabove, or if I have misunderstood any aspect of your advice. Thank you for yourassistance in this matter.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.