Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.40
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree.

Question

From:

(Redacted)

Sent:

Monday, September 21, 2009 7:23 PM

To:

Verne, B. Michael

Cc:

(Redacted)

Subject: Rule801.40

Mike,

I am writing toseek your views on the filing obligations of the parties to the proposedtransaction described below:

Company A (acorporation) and Company B (an LLC) plan to combine some of their businesses asfollows:

Company X, throughits wholly owned subsidiary X-sub (a corporation), owns approximately 40% ofthe interests in Company B. Company A will form Newco (a corporation) andcontribute some its assets to Newco. Company X will contribute its interest inCompany B through the merger of X-sub into Newco, with Newco surviving. CompanyX will receive Newco Common Stock as merger consideration. Company X will alsosell some of its Newco Common Stock to Company A. Newco now has twoshareholders, Company X (30%) and Company A (70%), and owns 40% of Company Band the contributed assets from Company A. Newco contributes the Company Aassets to Company B in exchange for additional interests in Company B, and, asa result, Newco owns a majority of the interests in Company B.

We have analyzedthis entire transaction as the formation of a joint venture under Rule 801.40with Company A and Company X, each filing as acquiring persons and neitherNewco nor Company B filing as acquired persons.

Do you agree withour analysis?

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.