Skip to main content
Date
Rule
801.10
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Corp would be exempt under 802.4, so not separately reportable. When agreements have been entered into to acquire 100% in contemporaneous steps, you can't break out each step and analyze it separately. That would be akin to saying that you have entered into agreements with 20 shareholders to acquire 100% of the voting securities of a closely-held corporation for a total of $200 MM, but the transaction is not reportable because each shareholder is only selling 5%, valued at $10 MM.

Question

From:(Redacted)
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:30 AM
To: Verne, B. Michael
Cc: (Redacted)

Subject: HSRanalysis question

Good morningMike.

Would you pleaselet us know whether you agree with the following analysis?

Company A andCompany B meet the size of parties thresholds under the HSR. Company B is anLLC controlled by a husband+wife UPE. Company A plans to acquire 100% of LLCinterests of Company B for approximately $187.5 million through the followingacquisitions that will occur at the same time:

An acquisition of a controlling (just over 50%) LLCinterest in Company B from a husband+wife UPE;

An acquisition of all the shares of a C Corp (notcontrolled by a husband+ wife UPE) whose sale
asset is a noncontrolling (41%) LLC interest in Company B; and

Acquisitions of the remaining noncontrolling LLCinterests from two individual unrelated holders.

Only the firstacquisition would be reportable under the HSR. The acquisition of C corp'sshares would be exempt under 802.4, because its sale asset is an HSR exemptminority interest in the LLC. The two acquisitions from minority holders wouldbe exempt as acquisitions of noncontrolling LLC interests. Do you agree?

While all thetransactions will occur simultaneously, the reportable value of the transactionseems to depend on the order of the individual purchases. If Company A acquiresthe controlling LLC interest first, it would pay the filing fee based on theportion of the total purchase price attributable to that controlling interest.Its subsequent acquisitions of

the remaining,noncontrolling LLC interests in Company B would be exempt under 802.30.

However, ifCompany A acquires the noncontrolling interests first (these acquisitions wouldbe exempt), and then acquires the controlling interest, it would have toaggregate the value of all interests held as a result of the last acquisition under801.10(d) and pay the filing fee based on the entire purchase price.

Given that allthe transactions will occur simultaneously, are the companies free to order theacquisitions in such a way as to have the acquisition of the controlling LLCinterest occur first and determine the filing fee accordingly (i.e. based onthe portion of the total purchase price attributable to that controllinginterest)? There would be an HSR filing in any event; the only issue is thefiling fee amount.

About Informal Interpretations

Informal interpretations provide guidance from previous staff interpretations on the applicability of the HSR rules to specific fact situations. You should not rely on them as a substitute for reading the Act and the Rules themselves. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.

Learn more about Informal Interpretations.